Jorge Quezada v. Con-Way Inc.
Filing
87
ORDER Requiring Parties to Meet and Confer Re Pending Discovery Dispute. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)
1
2
3
NOT FOR CITATION
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
EUREKA DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. 09-CV-03670 JSW (NJV)
JORGE R. QUEZADA,
12
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
MEET AND CONFER RE: PENDING
DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
Defendant.
16
(Docket No. 86)
CON-WAY, INC.,
/
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The district court has referred the current discovery dispute and all discovery matters in this
to the undersigned. (Doc. No. 86.) Counsel for both parties SHALL engage in an in-person meet
and confer by October 23, 2012, regarding the pending discovery dispute. Given counsels' diverse
locations, counsel may participate by telephone. Counsel shall engage in a meaningful meet and
confer regarding outstanding discovery requests and the pending discovery dispute. Counsel shall
notify the court’s courtroom deputy, Gloria Masterson (Gloria_Masterson@cand.uscourts.gov), by
email of the scheduled date for the in-person meet and confer. After the in-person meet and confer,
the parties shall promptly file a single joint letter brief to the court informing the court of the status
of the in-person meet and confer. If the parties are unable to resolve their discovery disputes after
1
the in-person meet and confer, the single joint letter brief, no longer than five pages, shall succinctly
2
set forth the parties’ positions on each disputed issue.
3
Per this Court’s standing order, for future discovery-related motions, counsel must deliver
4
two (2) chambers copies of all filings.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
DATED: October 2, 2012
__________________
8
Nandor J. Vadas
United States Magistrate Judge
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?