Jorge Quezada v. Con-Way Inc.
Filing
96
ORDER re 94 Motion to Compel Further Responses to Deposition Questions filed by Jorge R. Quezada, Order Requiring Parties to Meet and Confer Regarding Pending Discovery Dispute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 12/3/2012. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)
1
2
3
NOT FOR CITATION
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
EUREKA DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. 09-CV-03670 JSW (NJV)
JORGE R. QUEZADA,
12
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
MEET AND CONFER REGARDING
PENDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
(Docket No. 94)
CON-WAY, INC.,
Defendant.
16
/
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On November 27, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order compelling further responses to
deposition questions. (Docket no. 94.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1)
Counsel for both parties SHALL engage in a meaningful, in-person meet and confer no later
than Monday, December 10, 2012, regarding the pending discovery dispute. Given counsels'
diverse locations, counsel may participate by telephone. Counsel shall notify the court’s courtroom
deputy, Gloria Masterson (Gloria_Masterson@cand.uscourts.gov), by email of the scheduled date for
the in-person meet and confer.
2)
Any party refusing to meet and confer will be sanctioned.
3)
After the in-person meet and confer, the parties shall promptly file a single joint letter brief
to the court informing the court of the status of the in-person meet and confer. The letter
brief shall be limited to five pages, with no more than ten pages of exhibits, to be shared
equally between the parties. If the parties are unable to resolve their discovery dispute after
1
the in-person meet and confer, the single joint letter brief, no longer than five pages, shall
2
succinctly set forth the parties’ positions on each disputed issue.
3
4
5
4)
Plaintiff's motion is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR and no response to it shall be filed at this
time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
DATED: December 3, 2012
__________________
8
Nandor J. Vadas
United States Magistrate Judge
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?