Jorge Quezada v. Con-Way Inc.

Filing 96

ORDER re 94 Motion to Compel Further Responses to Deposition Questions filed by Jorge R. Quezada, Order Requiring Parties to Meet and Confer Regarding Pending Discovery Dispute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 12/3/2012. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 NOT FOR CITATION 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EUREKA DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. 09-CV-03670 JSW (NJV) JORGE R. QUEZADA, 12 ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER REGARDING PENDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 (Docket No. 94) CON-WAY, INC., Defendant. 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On November 27, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order compelling further responses to deposition questions. (Docket no. 94.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1) Counsel for both parties SHALL engage in a meaningful, in-person meet and confer no later than Monday, December 10, 2012, regarding the pending discovery dispute. Given counsels' diverse locations, counsel may participate by telephone. Counsel shall notify the court’s courtroom deputy, Gloria Masterson (, by email of the scheduled date for the in-person meet and confer. 2) Any party refusing to meet and confer will be sanctioned. 3) After the in-person meet and confer, the parties shall promptly file a single joint letter brief to the court informing the court of the status of the in-person meet and confer. The letter brief shall be limited to five pages, with no more than ten pages of exhibits, to be shared equally between the parties. If the parties are unable to resolve their discovery dispute after 1 the in-person meet and confer, the single joint letter brief, no longer than five pages, shall 2 succinctly set forth the parties’ positions on each disputed issue. 3 4 5 4) Plaintiff's motion is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR and no response to it shall be filed at this time. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: December 3, 2012 __________________ 8 Nandor J. Vadas United States Magistrate Judge 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?