Kemp v. International Business Machines Corp.

Filing 63

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES re 62 Stipulation filed by International Business Machines Corp. Discovery due by 12/1/2011. Motions due by 1/13/2012. Replies due by 3/16/2012. Responses due by 3/2/2012. Motion Hearing set for 3/30/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/6/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Catherine Nasser, SB # 246191 JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 Email: cnasser@jonesday.com Matthew W. Lampe (admitted pro hac vice) mwlampe@jonesday.com Wendy C. Butler (admitted pro hac vice) wbutler@jonesday.com JONES DAY 222 East 41st Street New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 326-3939 Facsimile: (212) 755-7306 Mark R. Thierman, SB # 72913 Joshua D. Buck SB # 258325 THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, Nevada 89511 Tel: (775) 284-1500 Scott A. Miller, Esq., SB # 230322 LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT A. MILLER A Professional Corporation 16133 Ventura Blvd. Suite 645 Encino, CA 91436 Tel.: (818) 788-8081 12 Steven L. Miller, Esq., SB # 106023 LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN L. MILLER A Professional Corporation 16133 Ventura Blvd. Suite 645 Encino, CA 91436 Tel.: (818) 986-8900 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 LEE KEMP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, the general public, and as an “aggrieved employee” under the California Labor Code Private Attorney General Act, 22 23 24 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES Plaintiff, 20 21 Case No. CV 09-03683-EMC v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP., a New York Corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadlines Case No. CV 09-03683-EMC 1 Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 7-12, Plaintiff Lee Kemp (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 2 International Business Machines Corporation (“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned 3 counsel, hereby stipulate and request as follows: 4 5 WHEREAS, on July 15, 2011, the Court entered an Order setting the following case schedule: 6 a. November 1, 2011: Class Certification Discovery Closes; 7 b. December 15, 2011: Class Certification and Summary Judgment Motions Due; 8 c. January 31, 2012: Oppositions to Class Certification and Summary Judgment 9 Motions Due; 10 d. February 15, 2012: Reply Briefs in Support of Class Certification and Summary 11 Judgment Motions Due; and 12 e. March 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM: Hearing on Class Certification and Summary Judgment 13 14 Motions. WHEREAS, the parties have been working in good faith to resolve discovery issues and 15 to complete discovery by the November 1, 2011 deadline; however, the parties agree that they 16 require additional time; 17 WHEREAS, the parties request that the dates reflected above be extended to provide the 18 parties 30 days of additional discovery before briefing of class certification and summary 19 judgment as to Plaintiff's individual claims; 20 21 22 WHEREAS, other than extending each of the deadlines above by 30 days, such extensions will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by the Court; WHEREAS, the only prior time modifications were the Court’s September 25, 2009 and 23 April 30, 2010 extensions of Defendant’s deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint, 24 the Court’s April 30, 2010 and June 3, 2010 extensions of the ADR deadline, and the Court’s July 25 15, 2011 extension of the case schedule deadlines. 26 27 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel: 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadlines -2- Case No. CV 09-03683-EMC 1 2 All deadlines in paragraph 9 of the Court’s July 15, 2011 Order will be extended as follows: 3 a. December 1, 2011: Class Certification Discovery Closes 4 b. January 13, 2012: Class Certification and Summary Judgment Motions Due 5 c. March 2, 2012: Oppositions to Class Certification and Summary Judgment 6 7 8 9 10 Motions Due d. March 16, 2012: Reply Briefs in Support of Class Certification and Summary Judgment Motions Due e. March 30, 2012 at 1:30 PM: Hearing on Class Certification and Summary Judgment Motions. 11 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 14 Dated: October 5, 2011 JONES DAY 15 By: 16 17 18 19 Dated: October 5, 2011 /s/ Catherine S. Nasser Catherine S. Nasser Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC 20 21 By: 22 23 /s/ Joshua D. Buck Joshua D. Buck Attorneys for Plaintiff LEE KEMP 24 25 26 27 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadlines -3- Case No. CV 09-03683-EMC 1 Dated: October 5, 2011 JONES DAY 2 By: /S/ Catherine S. Nasser Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION 3 4 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 10/6 Dated: _____________, 2011 S dwar Judge E H ER 15 FO RT 14 en d M. Ch NO 13 LI SFI-713108v1 R NIA __________________________________ RED Honorable Edward SO Chen E M. ORD IS I District Court Judge United StatesT 11 12 UNIT ED 10 RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 8 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadlines -4- Case No. CV 09-03683-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?