Bojorquez v. Gutierrez et al

Filing 118

ORDER extending discovery deadline (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2010)

Bojorquez v. Gutierrez et al

Doc. 118

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

ANTONIO L. CORTÉS Attorney at Law Bar No. 142356 528 Wisteria Way San Rafael, California 94903 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorney for Plaintiff Wenceslao Bojorquez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MARTHA GUTIERREZ, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) _________________________________ ) WENCESLAO BOJORQUEZ, CASE NO. CV 09-3684 SI STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Honorable Susan Illston Complaint filed: August 12, 2009

The undersigned counsel jointly request this honorable Court to continue, until January 7, 2010, the time within which to complete non-expert discovery. Good cause for the requested continuance exists in that: (1) the Early Neutral Evaluation session, completed November 1, 2010, did not result in settlement, in large part due to divergent factual contentions that are likely to be resolved through further discovery; (2) as discussed at the last Case Management Conference the Early Neutral Evaluation process was delayed without fault of the parties; (3) as discussed at the last Case

25 26
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS 528 WISTERIA WAY SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 [phone] FAX: [phone]

Management Conference the parties, in the interest of economical litigation, had desired to

27 28 __________________________________________________________________________ 1 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

defer some discovery proceedings, including but not limited to more costly proceedings such as depositions and third-party discovery, until after hearing the Neutral's evaluation and discovery recommendations and attempting to settle the matter with the Neutral's assistance. The parties would like to remind the Court that it had indicated at the last Case Management Conference that the parties should request more time for discovery if necessary. DATED: November 12, 2010 _______________/s/_______________ Antonio L. Cortes Counsel for Plaintiff

DATED: November 12, 2010

CARLSON LAW GROUP, INC. by ______________/s/___________________, Roger G. Honey, Counsel for Martha Gutierrez and Marin 1 Real Estate

DATED: November 12, 2010

HOUSER & ALLISON, APC by______________/s/___________________ Brent A. Kramer, Counsel for Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC

Attorney Attestation Pursuant to General Order 45, I attest that I obtained the concurrence of the other signatories to this e-filed document before filing it.

23 24 25 26
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS 528 WISTERIA WAY SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 [phone] FAX: [phone]

DATED: November 12, 2010 _______________/s/_______________ Antonio L. Cortes [PROPOSED] ORDER __________________________________________________________________________ 2 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

27 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS 528 WISTERIA WAY SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 [phone] FAX: [phone]

The foregoing parties having jointly requested to continue, until January 7, 2010, the time within which to complete non-expert discovery, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, that the time within which to complete non-expert discovery is continued until January 7, 2010. SO ORDERED

Date: _________________

___________________________ Susan Illston United States District Judge

27 28 __________________________________________________________________________ 3 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER