Bojorquez v. Gutierrez et al
Filing
118
ORDER extending discovery deadline (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2010)
Bojorquez v. Gutierrez et al
Doc. 118
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS Attorney at Law Bar No. 142356 528 Wisteria Way San Rafael, California 94903 Tel: 415-256-1911 Fax: 415-256-1919 Attorney for Plaintiff Wenceslao Bojorquez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MARTHA GUTIERREZ, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) _________________________________ ) WENCESLAO BOJORQUEZ, CASE NO. CV 09-3684 SI STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Honorable Susan Illston Complaint filed: August 12, 2009
The undersigned counsel jointly request this honorable Court to continue, until January 7, 2010, the time within which to complete non-expert discovery. Good cause for the requested continuance exists in that: (1) the Early Neutral Evaluation session, completed November 1, 2010, did not result in settlement, in large part due to divergent factual contentions that are likely to be resolved through further discovery; (2) as discussed at the last Case Management Conference the Early Neutral Evaluation process was delayed without fault of the parties; (3) as discussed at the last Case
25 26
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS 528 WISTERIA WAY SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 (415) 256-1911 FAX: (415) 256-1919
Management Conference the parties, in the interest of economical litigation, had desired to
27 28 __________________________________________________________________________ 1 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
defer some discovery proceedings, including but not limited to more costly proceedings such as depositions and third-party discovery, until after hearing the Neutral's evaluation and discovery recommendations and attempting to settle the matter with the Neutral's assistance. The parties would like to remind the Court that it had indicated at the last Case Management Conference that the parties should request more time for discovery if necessary. DATED: November 12, 2010 _______________/s/_______________ Antonio L. Cortes Counsel for Plaintiff
DATED: November 12, 2010
CARLSON LAW GROUP, INC. by ______________/s/___________________, Roger G. Honey, Counsel for Martha Gutierrez and Marin 1 Real Estate
DATED: November 12, 2010
HOUSER & ALLISON, APC by______________/s/___________________ Brent A. Kramer, Counsel for Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
Attorney Attestation Pursuant to General Order 45, I attest that I obtained the concurrence of the other signatories to this e-filed document before filing it.
23 24 25 26
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS 528 WISTERIA WAY SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 (415) 256-1911 FAX: (415) 256-1919
DATED: November 12, 2010 _______________/s/_______________ Antonio L. Cortes [PROPOSED] ORDER __________________________________________________________________________ 2 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
27 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS 528 WISTERIA WAY SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 (415) 256-1911 FAX: (415) 256-1919
The foregoing parties having jointly requested to continue, until January 7, 2010, the time within which to complete non-expert discovery, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, that the time within which to complete non-expert discovery is continued until January 7, 2010. SO ORDERED
Date: _________________
___________________________ Susan Illston United States District Judge
27 28 __________________________________________________________________________ 3 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?