Bojorquez v. Gutierrez et al
Filing
66
ORDER continuing cmc to 6/18/10 @ 2:30 p.m. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS Attorney at Law (CA Bar No. 142356) 528 Wisteria Way San Rafael, California 94903 Tel: 415-256-1911 Fax: 415-256-1919 Attorney for Plaintiffs Wenceslao Bojorquez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WENCESLAO BOJORQUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MARTHA GUTIERREZ, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) _________________________________ ) CASE NO. CV 09-3684 SI STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE OF APRIL 29, 2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE L.R. 7-12 Judge: Honorable Susan Illston
RECITALS WHEREAS, Plaintiff's counsel has previously sought, received, and been grateful for a continuance of the Case Management Conference previously set for April 16, 2010, 2:30 pm, due to his need to appear at a three-week trial before Judge Ware in this district on that date; WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference is now set for April 29, 2010 at 2:30 pm;
24 25 26
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS 528 WISTERIA WAY SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 (415) 256-1911 FAX: (415) 256-1919
WHEREAS, Judge Ware has had to reschedule that same trial to full days at a later time and it is now set to commence on April 27, 2010 and to end on May 7, 2010;
27 28 __________________________________________________________________________ 1 STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE OF APRIL 29, 2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
WHEREAS, although Plaintiff's counsel would normally ask Judge Ware, as the second judge to schedule a conflicting appearance at a given time, Judge Ware's trial requires the attendance of multiple witnesses, counsel from Southern California, and expert and other witnesses from other states, making it difficult to reschedule; WHEREAS the parties in this case have agreed to continue the April 29, 2010, 2:30 pm Case Management Conference to a date convenient to the Court after May 7, 2010, STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties who have appeared in this action and have not been dismissed from it that the April 29, 2010 2:30 pm Case Management Conference shall be continued to a date convenient to the Court after May 7, 2010. DATED: April 2, 2010 ______________/s/_________________ Antonio L. Cortés Attorney for Plaintiff Wenceslao Bojorquez DATED: April 6, 2010 CARLSON LAW GROUP, INC.
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS 528 WISTERIA WAY SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 (415) 256-1911 FAX: (415) 256-1919
By: ______________/s/_________________ Roger G. Honey, Attorneys for Martha Gutierrez and Marin 1 Real Estate DATED: April 2, 2010 THE RYAN FIRM A Professional Corporation
27 28
By: ______________/s/_________________ Timothy Ryan, Attorneys for Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC __________________________________________________________________________ 2 STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE OF APRIL 29, 2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ANTONIO L. CORTÉS 528 WISTERIA WAY SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 (415) 256-1911 FAX: (415) 256-1919
DATED: April 2, 2010
HOUSER & ALLISON A Professional Corporation By: ______________/s/_________________ Brent A. Kramer, Attorneys for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
DATED: April 6, 2010
SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation By: ______________/s/_________________ Regina J. McClendon, Attorney for Litton Loan Servicing LP
DATED: April 5, 2010
JEFFERY S. NELSON Litigation Counsel Fidelity National Financial, Inc. ______________/s/___________________ Attorney for Chicago Title Company ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The April 29, 2010 Case Management Conference is continued until _____________, 2010 at ________m.
DATED: ____________, 2010
__________________________________ Susan Illston, United States District Judge
27 28 __________________________________________________________________________ 3 STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE OF APRIL 29, 2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?