Squire Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. Takieddine

Filing 67

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2010)

Download PDF
Squire Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. Takieddine Doc. 67 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. Joseph A. Meckes (State Bar # 190279) Christopher D. Mays (State Bar # 266510) 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: +1.415.954.0200 Facsimile: +1.415.393.9887 Email: JMeckes@ssd.com CMays@ssd.com Attorneys for Plaintiff SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P. 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P., a Limited Liability Partnership, Plaintiff, vs. ZIAD TAKIEDDINE, Defendant. Case No. CV 09-03699 SI STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. CV 09-03699 (SI) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT: Pursuant to a settlement agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiff and Defendant agree and request that all claims asserted in this Action be dismissed with prejudice. This stipulation of dismissal is made pursuant to Rule 41(a). Dated: November 3, 2010 ___________/s/____________________ Joseph A. Meckes SQUIRE, SANDERS AND DEMPSEY L.L.P. Attorneys for Plaintiff Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. Dated: November 3, 2010 ___________/s/__________________ David L. Winnett HINSHAW & CULBERTSON Attorneys for Defendant Ziad Takieddine IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P. 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 DATED: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. CV 09-03699 (SI)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?