Galli v. Pittsburg Unified School District

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING 17 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on October 28, 2009. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-03775-JSW Document17 Filed10/28/09 Page1 of 3 1 DAVID SCHER, California Bar No. 184562 THE EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, P.C. th 2 888 17 Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20006 3 dscher@employmentlawgroup.net 4 (202) 261-2802 (202) 261-2835 (facsimile) 5 Counsel for Plaintiff Tim Galli 6 7 8 9 10 The Employment Law Group, P.C. 888 17th Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20006 Ph: 202.331.2883 · Fax: 202.261.2835 11 TIM GALLI, 12 13 14 vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:09-cv-03775-JSW JOINT STIPULATION ON CASE SCHEDULING AND THE SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND ORDER THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL 15 DISTRICT, BARBARA WILSON and PERCY MCGEE, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS COURT, THE PARTIES HEREBY 20 STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. On October 9, 2009, the parties agreed to stipulate to various matters, including a 22 Case Management Conference on January 8, 2009, telephonically, subject to the Court's approval. 2. On October 10, 2009, the Court Ordered that a Case Management Conference will be held, in person, on January 8, 2009. 2. Plaintiff is unavailable in person on January 8, 2009, the prior date set for the Case Management Conference. The parties have, however, agreed to hold the Initial Case Management Conference on January 29, 2010, in person, subject to the Court's approval. 3. The parties additionally agree to serve discovery in this matter via electronic mail JOINT STIPULATION ON CASE SCHEDULING AND THE SERVICE OF PLEADINGS 1 Case No. 3:09-cv-03775-JSW Case3:09-cv-03775-JSW Document17 Filed10/28/09 Page2 of 3 1 with a copy sent to the following recipients on behalf of Plaintiff and Defendants: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The Employment Law Group, P.C. 888 17th Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20006 Ph: 202.331.2883 · Fax: 202.261.2835 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DATED: October 28, 2009 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 By: /s/ Roy A. Combs Attorneys for Defendandts PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BARBARA WILSON AND PERCY MCGEE Respectfully submitted, FAGEN FRIEDMAN & FULFROST, LLP SO STIPULATED. DATED: October 28, 2009 Respectfully submitted, THE EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, P.C. On behalf of Plaintiff David Scher (dscher@employmentlawgroup.net) R. Scott Oswald (SOswald@employmentlawgroup.com) Janice Pardue (jpardue@emplymentlawgroup.com) On behalf of Defendants Roy A. Combs (rcombs@fagenfriedman.com) Joshua A. Stevens (jstevens@fagenfriedman.com) Lisa Howell (lhowel@fagenfriedman.com) Jane Forrette (jforrette@fagenfriedman.com) By: /s/ David Scher Attorneys for Plaintiff TIM GALLI JOINT STIPULATION ON CASE SCHEDULING AND THE SERVICE OF PLEADINGS Case No. 3:09-cv-03775-JSW Case3:09-cv-03775-JSW Document17 Filed10/28/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the above Stipulation of the parties, that the case 3 schedule be amended as outlined above and that discovery in this matter will be served via electronic mail with a copy sent to the recipients listed in the above Stipulation. 5 The initial case management shall be attended by counsel and is reset for January 29, 2010 at 1:30pm. The method of service for discovery is entirely within the parties' discretion. 6 October 28, 2009 __________________________ 7 DATED:_______________ 8 9 10 The Employment Law Group, P.C. 888 17th Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20006 Ph: 202.331.2883 · Fax: 202.261.2835 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Hon. Jeffrey S. White UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE JOINT STIPULATION ON CASE SCHEDULING AND THE SERVICE OF PLEADINGS Case No. 3:09-cv-03775-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?