The Anschutz Corporation v. Merryll Lynch & Co., Inc. et al

Filing 435

ORDER RE REQUEST TO MODIFY JUNE 5, 2012 ORDER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 THE ANSCHUTZ CORPORATION, No. C 09-03780 SI 6 Plaintiff, ORDER RE REQUEST TO MODIFY JUNE 5, 2012 ORDER 7 v. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 MERRILL LYNCH & CO., et al., Defendants. / Currently before the Court is defendant Fitch, Inc.’s request to modify this Court’s June 5, 2012 Order granting in part Fitch’s motions to compel. Specifically, Fitch asks the Court to amend the Order 13 to the extent it required plaintiff to search the files of Bruce Black for documents between the dates of 14 January 4, 2004 through August 27, 2009, and instead order that those files be searched for responsive 15 documents up to the present. Fitch argues that plaintiff has agreed to produce documents beyond the 16 date of August 27, 2009, with respect to two categories of documents, documents regarding plaintiff’s 17 settlement with Credit Suisse and documents related to plaintiff’s sales of the securities at issue, and 18 asserts that documents regarding the settlement with Credit Suisse (which occurred in September 2010) 19 are highly relevant to damages issues in this case. 20 The Court agrees that an amendment of the June 5, 2009 Order is necessary and amends the 21 Order as follows: 22 23 24 Plaintiff shall search Mr. Black’s files for responsive documents dated between January 4, 2004 and August 27, 2009, except that documents regarding plaintiff’s settlement with Credit Suisse and documents related to plaintiff’s sales of the securities at issue shall also be produced without respect to the date of those documents. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: June 6, 2012 27 28 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?