The Anschutz Corporation v. Merryll Lynch & Co., Inc. et al

Filing 86

ORDER extending ADR certification deadline (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-03780-SI Document77 Filed11/13/09 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMI WINTZ MCKEON, State Bar No. 237923 ELIZABETH A. FROHLICH, State Bar No. 195454 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 Tel: 415.442.1000 Fax: 415.442.1001 jmckeon@morganlewis.com efrohlich@morganlewis.com Attorneys for Defendant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION THE ANSCHUTZ CORPORATION, Plaintiff, vs. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.; MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.; MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC.; THE McGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.; FITCH, INC.; AND FITCH RATINGS, INC., Defendants. Case No. C 09-3780-SI Hon. Susan Illston STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Complaint Filed: August 17, 2009 Trial Date: None set 1 CASE NO. C 09-3780-SI STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION Case3:09-cv-03780-SI Document77 Filed11/13/09 Page2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 13, 2009 Dated: November 13, 2009 STIPULATION WHEREAS, on November 13, 2009, Defendant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ("DBSI") communicated with Plaintiff The Anschutz Corporation ("Plaintiff") (collectively the "Parties") regarding the possible use of Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") in connection with this case; WHEREAS, DBSI requested additional time to obtain the ADR Certification from its client, pursuant to Local Rule 16-8(b); WHEREAS, Plaintiff has no objection to DBSI's request; Now, therefore, the Parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows: The deadline for DBSI to file its ADR Certification, pursuant to Local Rule 16-8(b), has been extended from November 13, 2009 to November 20, 2009. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP JAMI WINTZ MCKEON ELIZABETH A. FROHLICH By /s/ Elizabeth A. Frohlich Elizabeth A. Frohlich Attorneys for Defendant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. By /s/ R. Alexander Saveri R. Alexander Saveri Attorneys for Plaintiff The Anschutz Corporation 2 CASE NO. C 09-3780-SI STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION Case3:09-cv-03780-SI Document77 Filed11/13/09 Page3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. November ____, 2009 __________________________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge 3 CASE NO. C 09-3780-SI STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION Case3:09-cv-03780-SI Document77 Filed11/13/09 Page4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GENERAL ORDER 45 CERTIFICATION I, Elizabeth A. Frohlich, hereby attest pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45 that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. Dated: November 13, 2009 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By /s/ Elizabeth A. Frohlich Elizabeth A. Frohlich Attorneys for Defendant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. 4 CASE NO. C 09-3780-SI STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION Case3:09-cv-03780-SI Document77 Filed11/13/09 Page5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?