Singh v. Mayorkas

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 11 Stipulation filed by Alejandro Mayorkas. Signed by Judge James Larson on 12/17/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-03931-JL Document11 Filed12/16/09 Page1 of 2 1 J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney 2 J OANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Chief, Civil Division 3 EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 4 1301 Clay Street, Suite 340S 5 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 637-3697 6 FAX: (510) 637-3724 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 GURMAIL SINGH, 12 13 14 v. Plaintiff , ) ) No. C 09-3931 JL ) ) ) STIPULATION TO DISMISS; AND ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 15 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, United States Citizenship and 16 Immigration Services, 17 18 19 D ef en d a n t . Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendant, by and through his attorney of 20 record, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to dismiss the above-entitled action 21 without prejudice in light of the fact that American Embassy in New Delhi has received 22 authorization to process a travel document for the plaintiff's son and the plaintiff's son is 23 scheduled for an interview on January 7, 2010 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // STIPULATION TO DISMISS C 09-3931 JL 1 Case3:09-cv-03931-JL Document11 Filed12/16/09 Page2 of 2 1 Dated: December 15, 2009 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: December 15, 2009 8 9 10 11 12 13 Date: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS C 09-3931 JL 2 12/17/09 Respectfully submitted, J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant /s/ J ONATHAN M. KAUFMAN Attorney for Plaintiff [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. JAMES LARSON United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?