Peters v. County of Humboldt

Filing 25

ORDER continuing CMC and hearing on 12(B)(6) Motion re 22 Stipulation filed by Jamie Lynn Peters, ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 22 Stipulation, 5 MOTION to Dismiss : Motion Hearing set for 3/5/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/5/2010 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/16/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2010)

Download PDF
LAW OFFICES OF DALE GALIPO Dale K. Galipo, State Bar No. 144074 2 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310 Woodland Hills, California 91367 3 Telephone (818) 347-3333 Facsimile (818) 347-4118 4 dalegalipo@yahoo.com 1 BRIAN E. CLAYPOOL, SBN 134674 THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM 6 1055 E. Colorado Blvd., 5th Floor Pasadena, California 91106 7 becesq@aol.com Telephone: (626) 240-4616 8 Facsimile: (626) 240-4617 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMIE LYNN PETERS, individually ) and as successor-in-interest to JAMES ) ) L. PETERS, ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) ) ) ) COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT; and ) Does 1-10, inclusive, ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) Case Number: CV09-4021 CRB [PROPOSED] AMENDED ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S 12(B)(6) MOTION [PROPOSED] ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference and the hearing on Defendants' Motion 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 05, should be continued to March 12, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C _______________________________ TA UNIT ED Honorable Judge Charles R. Breyer D United States District Judge RDERE R. Brey er S Signed: Feb. 16, 2010 RT U O ER N D IS T IC T R OF 2 A C LI FO harles Judge C R NIA O IT IS S O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?