Vieste, LLC et al v. Hill Redwood Development, LTD. et al

Filing 121

ORDER RE 117 MOTION Motion for Administrative Relief to Extend Fact Discovery Cut-Off to Allow For Discovery in Mexico, Date of Trial, and Related Pre-Trial Deadlines. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on August 11, 2010. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 VIESTE, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HILL REDWOOD DEVELOPMENT, LTD., et al., Defendants. 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has received Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief to Extend Fact Discovery Cut-Off to Allow for Discovery in Mexico, Date of Trial, and Related Pretrial Deadlines, which was filed on August 10, 2010. The Court has now issued its Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' motion for leave to file a First Amended Counterclaim. In that Order, the Court stated that its decision was based, in part, on its willingness to grant a limited extension of impending deadlines. A further case management conference is scheduled for August 27, 2010, and a joint case management conference statement is due on August 20, 2010. In light of the Court's ruling on the motion for leave to amend, the Court shall grant the parties one final opportunity to resolve their disputes regarding scheduling without court assistance. If they are unable to do so, Plaintiffs should submit their response to Defendant's administrative motion on August 20, 2010, and the parties need not include that dispute in the joint case management conference statement. No. C 09-04024 JSW ORDER RE MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Accordingly, the parties are HEREBY ORDERED to take a deep breath and then to once again meet and confer in person to see if they can resolve their differences regarding the deadlines for: (1) fact discovery cut-off; (2) expert discovery and disclosure; (3) the deadline to hear dispositive motions, (4) pretrial; and (5) trial. The Court notes that it has numerous cases on its docket and has expended a great deal of energy on this case merely to enable the parties to the reach a stage where the pleadings are at issue. As such, the Court strongly encourages parties to expend their time and energy on more substantive matters and to reach an agreement on the proposed deadlines. IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California Dated: August 11, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?