Vieste, LLC et al v. Hill Redwood Development, LTD. et al
Filing
445
ORDER EXCLUDING Affirmative Defenses. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on February 7, 2012. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
VIESTE, LLC, ET AL.,
8
Plaintiffs,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 09-04024 JSW
ORDER EXCLUDING
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
v.
HILL REDWOOD DEVELOPMENT, ET AL.,
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
/
13
14
Following the pretrial conference, the Court issues this Order to provide its ruling on
15
Plaintiffs’ request to preclude Defendants from offering the affirmative defenses of comparative
16
fault and mitigation of damages. Defendants did not assert these defenses in their answers, did
17
not disclose these defenses in response to contention interrogatories, and did not raise the issue
18
with Plaintiffs until preparing for the pretrial conference. Indeed, Defendants did not include
19
these defenses in the proposed pretrial order the parties submitted with their pretrial conference
20
filings. During oral argument on Plaintiffs’ motion, Plaintiffs demonstrated that they would be
21
prejudiced by permitting Defendants to argue these defenses to the jury. Accordingly, having
22
carefully considered the parties’ briefing on this issue and their arguments at the pretrial
23
conference, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion in limine to preclude Defendants from
24
raising these affirmative defenses at trial.
25
With respect to the issue of mitigation of damages, although Defendants are precluded
26
from defending against Plaintiffs’ claims on this basis, the Court expressly reserves ruling on
27
whether the jury should be instructed on the question of whether Plaintiffs have a duty to
28
mitigate any damages they may have suffered.
1
Therefore, the Court shall revisit that issue at the time of the final charging conference.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: February 7, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?