Vieste, LLC et al v. Hill Redwood Development, LTD. et al

Filing 469

ORDER GRANTING 468 Joint MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on April 24, 2012. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2012)

Case3:09-cv-04024-JSW Document468-1 Filed04/24/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Patricia L. Peden (CA 206440)
LAW OFFICE OF PATRICIA L. PEDEN
1316 67th Street, Suite 6
Emeryville, California 94608
Telephone: [phone]
Nicholas H. Patton (admitted pro hac vice)
Robert W. Schroeder III (admitted pro hac vice)
Geoffrey P. Culbertson (admitted pro hac vice)
PATTON, TIDWELL & SCHROEDER, L.L.P.
4605 Texas Boulevard
Post Office Box 5398
Texarkana, Texas 75505-5398
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Courtney Towle (CA 221698)
Patton, Tidwell & Schroeder, L.L.P.
1316 67th Street
Emeryville, CA 94608
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
VIESTE, LLC and VIESTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

(1) VIESTE, LLC, an Indiana corporation; and
(2) VIESTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC; an
Indiana corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
(1) HILL REDWOOD DEVELOPMENT,
LTD., a British Virgin Islands corporation;
(2) HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a
Delaware corporation;
(3) HILL INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT LTD., a British Virgin
Islands corporation;
(4) REDWOOD CAPITAL ADVISORS,
LLC., a Delaware corporation;
(5) STEPHEN GOODMAN, individually; and
(6) S. DICK SARGON, individually;
Defendants,
______________________________________
And related Counterclaim.

No. C 09-04024 JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING DISMISSAL
AS MODIFIED AND
DIRECTING CLERK TO
CLOSE FILE

Case3:09-cv-04024-JSW Document468-1 Filed04/24/12 Page2 of 2

1
2
3
4

COME NOW all parties to the above-styled case informing the Court that the matter has
hereby been resolved pursuant to terms of a settlement agreement.
IT APPEARING to the Court that the matter has been settled, counsel for all parties having so
advised the Court, it is ORDERED that the case be, and it is hereby, dismissed with prejudice, subject

5
6

to the terms of the settlement agreement.

7

The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action upon cause shown

8

that settlement has not been completed and that a party wishes this Court to enforce the settlement

9

If the parties seek to re-open, they must be able to establish this Court
agreement specifically. has subject matter jurisdiction over any such dispute.
The status conference scheduled for April 27, 2012 is VACATED.

10
11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall close this file.

April 24, 2012
Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Dismissal– Page 1