Totah v. Lucasfilm Entertainment Company, Ltd

Filing 58

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 72-2. Defendants Motion 55 is premature, as no relief is sought thereby. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/13/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2010)

Totah v. Lucasfilm Entertainment Company, Ltd

Doc. 58

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, defendant's Motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice to refiling after Magistrate Judge James has ruled on defendant's motion for clarification and/or a protective order, should such motion be filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October13, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge v. LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD., Does 1-20, Defendant(s). / United States District Court TABITHA TOTAH Plaintiff(s), No. C-09-4051 MMC ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 72-2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Before the Court is defendant's Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Local Rule 72-2 ("Motion"), filed October 8, 2010, by which defendant seeks "only to preserve its objections" to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James's order of September 24, 2010 (see Mot. at 4:5-7) and is "not seeking affirmative relief from [said] [o]rder at this time" (see id. 4:4-5). Rather, defendant "is in the process of seeking clarification and/or a [p]rotective [o]rder" from the Magistrate Judge. (See id. at 3:18-20.) Given such circumstances, defendant's Motion is premature, as no relief is sought thereby.

Dockets.Justia.com