Totah v. Lucasfilm Entertainment Company, Ltd

Filing 97

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SUBMIT HUMAN RESOURCES' EXPERT RULE 26 REPORT. Denying 90 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010)

1 Janine S. Simerly (SBN 102361) [e-mail] 2 Lisa C. Hamasaki (SBN 197628) [e-mail] 3 Jennifer Cotner (SBN 255785) [e-mail] 4 MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 5 111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 6 Tel. [phone] Fax [phone] Attorneys for Defendant 8 LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD. 9 10 11 12 13 TABITHA TOTAH,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: C 09-4051 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SUBMIT HUMAN RESOURCES' EXPERT RULE 26 REPORT Honorable Maxine M. Chesney Complaint filed: July 30, 2009 Trial date: February 7, 2011

MILLER LAW GROUP

14 15 16 v.

Plaintiff(s),

17 LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD., Does 1-20, 18 19 20 21 22 23 Defendant(s).

Plaintiff TABITAH TOTAH filed a Motion for Additional Time to Submit Human

24 Resources' Expert Rule 26 Report Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 7-11 and Judge 25 Chesney's Standing Order No. 7 (the "Motion"). 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / /
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SUBMIT HUMAN RESOURCES' EXPERT RULE 26 REPORT ­ Case No.: C 09-4051 MMC

1

1

After full consideration of all papers and evidence submitted by the parties

2 both in support of and opposition to the Motion, and all other matters presented to this 3 Court, IT ISfor the reasons stated by defendants,hereby DENIED.ORDERED, the Motion is and HEREBY ORDERED, the Motion is IT IS HEREBY hereby DENIED. 4 5 November 22, 2010 6 Dated: ________________________ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

______________________________ HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4820-8046-1832, v. 1

MILLER LAW GROUP

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SUBMIT HUMAN RESOURCES' EXPERT RULE 26 REPORT ­ Case No.: C 09-4051 MMC

2