Hodges v. Immersion Corporation et al

Filing 67

ORDER RE: SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSES TO CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT. Richard Vogel is a "defendant" within the terms of the January 12, 2010 order, and the briefing schedule therein applies equally to him. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 20, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & W E S T LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB NO. 126930) [e-mail] JENNIFER BRETAN (CSB NO. 233475) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] JAY L. POMERANTZ (CSB NO. 209869) [e-mail] FELIX S. LEE (CSB NO. 197084) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, California 94041 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Immersion Corporation, Victor A. Viegas, Clent Richardson, Stephen Ambler, Richard Vogel and Daniel Chavez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re IMMERSION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Case No. CV 09-4073 MMC CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSES TO CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT (Civil L.R. 7-12)

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Judge: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 23 Date Action Filed: September 2, 2009 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSES TO CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV 09-4073 MMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & W E S T LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

WHEREAS, on January 12, 2010, this Court issued an order in the above-captioned action setting forth the following timing regarding the filing of Lead Plaintiff's Consolidated Complaint and the briefing of responses thereto (the "Briefing Schedule"): (i) Lead Plaintiff shall file a Consolidated Complaint no later than 60 days after Immersion's anticipated restatement is filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, but, absent further Order by the Court, in no event later than June 30, 2010; (ii) Defendants shall move, answer or otherwise respond to the Consolidated Complaint within 60 days after the Consolidated Complaint is filed; (iii) In the event Defendants move to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint, Lead Plaintiff shall file his opposition to Defendants' motion no later than 60 days after such motion is filed; and (iv) In the event Defendants move to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint, Defendants shall file any replies to Lead Plaintiff's opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than 40 days after such opposition is filed. WHEREAS, pursuant to the January 12, 2010 order, Lead Plaintiff filed his Consolidated Complaint on April 9, 2010, sixty (60) days after Immersion's February 8, 2010 restatement; WHEREAS, the Consolidated Complaint named Richard Vogel as an additional defendant; IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, by and between undersigned counsel for the Parties that: (i) Richard Vogel is a "Defendant" within the terms of the January 12, 2010 order; and (ii) the Briefing Schedule for responses to the Consolidated Complaint set out therein shall apply equally to Mr. Vogel. /// /// /// /// ///
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSES TO CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1

CASE NO. CV 09-4073 MMC

April 21, 2010