Singh v. United States of America et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FROM 4/28/10 to 5/5/10 at 10:30 a.m. #29 Stipulation filed by Golden Gate Bridge and Transportation District. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/12/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP KIMON MANOLIUS - 154971 kmanolius@hansonbridgett.com ALEXANDRA V. ATENCIO - 227251 aatencio@hansonbridgett.com 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 Attorneys for Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION DEEPANSHA SINGH, a minor, by her General Guardian, Deep Singh, Plaintiff, No. CV 09 4108 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ____________________________ Action Filed: September 4, 2009 14 v. 15 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, JOSHUA WOZMAN, and DOES 1-100, inclusive, The parties in this matter, Defendants GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY, AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ("District"), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ("USA"), and JOSHUA WOZMAN (collectively referred to herein as "Defendants"), and Plaintiff DEEPANSHA SINGH, a minor, by her General Guardian, Deep Singh (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an order continuing the hearin g on Defendant District's and USA's dispositive motions set in the above-captioned matter on April 28, 2010 to May 5, 2010, or as soon thereafter as may be allowed. -1STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; CASE NO. CV 09 4108 EMC 2273345.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 The parties further stipulate that all applicable deadlines will be reset to correspond with the new hearing date. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the accompanying proposed order. IT IS SO STIPULATED. I, Alexandra V. Atencio, hereby attest that the below named counsel have authorized me, 7 verbally and by email, to e-sign this document on their behalf. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; CASE NO. CV 09 4108 EMC 2273345.1 DATED: March 8, 2010 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP By: /s/ Alexandra V. Atencio ALEXANDRA V. ATENCIO Attorneys for Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT DATED: March 8, 2010 By:_/s/ Thomas R. Green________________ THOMAS R. GREEN Assistant United States Attorney for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DATED: March 8, 2010 ADAMS, NYE, TRAPANI, BECHT, LLP By:_/s/ Thomas A. Trapani______________ THOMAS A. TRAPANI Attorneys for Defendant JOSHUA WOZMAN DATED: March 8, 2010 THE KEANE LAW FIRM By: /s/ Christopher Keane_________________ CHRISTOPHER KEANE Attorney for Plaintiff 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. ORDER The Court, having reviewed the above Stipulation to Continue the Hearing on Defendants' Dispositive Motions, HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: The hearing on Defendant Golden Gate Bridge, Highway, and Transportation District's and the United States of America's dispositive motions, previously scheduled for April 28, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, of the U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 10:30 a.m. Francisco, CA, shall be continued to May 5, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, of the U.S. District Court. All applicable deadlines will be reset to correspond with the new hearing date UNIT ED 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 March 12, 2010 Dated: _______________________ __________________________________________ Hon. Edward M. D EChen S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O n ER N D IS T IC T R OF -3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; CASE NO. CV 09 4108 EMC 2273345.1 A C LI FO dward Judge E M. Che R NIA ORDER T IS SO DIFIED I AS MO NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?