Singh v. United States of America et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS HEARING re 32 Stipulation filed by Golden Gate Bridge and Transportation District. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/30/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2010)

Download PDF
1 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP KIMON MANOLIUS - 154971 2 kmanolius@hansonbridgett.com. ALEXANDRA V. ATENCIO - 22725 I 3 aatencio@hansonbridgett.com 425 Market Street, 26th Floor 4 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 5 Facsimile: . (415) 541-9366 6 Attorneys for Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND 7 TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 DEEPANSHA SINGH, a minor, by her General Guardian, Deep Singh, 13 No. CV 09 4108 EMC STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) Plaintiff, 14 ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING v. ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE 15 MOTIONS Action Filed: September 4, 2009 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, 17 JOSHUA WOZMAN, and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 The parties in this matter, Defendants GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY, AND 22 23 TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ("District"), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ("USA"), and JOSHUA WOZMAN (collectively referred to herein as "Defendants"), and Plaintiff 24 25 26 DEEPANSHA SINGH, a minor, by her General Guardian, Deep Singh (herein~fter "Plaintiff'), through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an order continuing the hearing on Defendant District's and USA's dispositive motions set in the above-captioned matter on May 5, 27 28 2010 to May 26, 2010, or as soon thereafter as may be allowed. Such continuance is necessary to facilitate the recent discussions between Plaintiff and the District regarding potential settlement of -i- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; CASE NO. CV 09 4 i 08 EMC 2300301.1 1 this action against the District, and will serve judicial economy in that if a settlement is reached 2 the District's dispositive motion will be unnecessary. 3 The parties further stipulate that all applicable deadlines will be reset to correspond with 4 the new hearing date. 5 Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the accompanying 6 proposed order. 7 IT is SO STIPULATED. 8 i, Alexandra V. Atencio, hereby attest that the below named counsel have authorized me, 9 verbally and by email, to e-sign this document on their behalf. 10 11 DATED: March 29, 2010 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 12 13 14 15 By: lsI Alexandra V. Atencio ALEXANDRA V. ATENCIO Attorneys for Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT DATED: March 29, 2010 16 17 18 19 20 21 By: lsI Thomas R. Green THOMAS R. GREEN Assistant United States Attorney for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DATED: March 29, 2010 ADAMS, NYE, TRAPANI, BECHT, LLP 22 23 24 25 By: lsI Thomas A. Trapani THOMAS A. TRAPANI Attorneys for Defendant JOSHUA WOZMAN 26 27 28 - 2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS: CASE NO. CV 09 4108 EMC 2300301.1 1 DATED: March 29, 2010 THE KEANE LAW FIRM 2 3 By: lsI Christopher Keane CHRISTOPHER KEANE Attorney for Plaintiff 4 6 ORDER 5 7 The Court, having reviewed the above Stipulation to Continue the Hearing on Defendants' 8 Dispositive Motions, HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 9 The hearing on Defendant Golden Gate Bridge, Highway, and Transportation District's 10 and the United States of America's dispositive motions, previously scheduled for May 5, 2010 at 11 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom: C, 15th Floor, of the U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 12 Francisco, CA, shall be continued to May 26, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, of 13 the U.S. District Court. All applicable deadlines will be reset to correspond with the new hearing 14 date UNIT ED 15 S S DISTRICT TE C TA 16 17 IT is SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: 19 3/30/10 20 21 ER N D IS T IC T R OF 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; CASE NO. CV 09 4108 EMC 2300301.1 A C LI FO n M. Che Edwardon. Edward M. Chen H Judge UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO Judge Edward M. Chen R NIA IT IS SO ORDERED R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT U O NO RT H RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?