Singh v. United States of America et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS HEARING re #32 Stipulation filed by Golden Gate Bridge and Transportation District. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/30/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2010)

1 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
KIMON MANOLIUS - 154971
2 [e-mail].

ALEXANDRA V. ATENCIO - 22725 I
3 [e-mail]

425 Market Street, 26th Floor
4 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: . [phone]
6 Attorneys for Defendant

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND 7 TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11

12 DEEPANSHA SINGH, a minor, by her
General Guardian, Deep Singh,
13

No. CV 09 4108 EMC
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)

Plaintiff,
14

ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING
v.
ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE

15

MOTIONS
Action Filed: September 4, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, 17 JOSHUA WOZMAN, and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
18

Defendants.
19

20
21

The parties in this matter, Defendants GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY, AND

22
23

TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ("District"), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ("USA"), and
JOSHUA WOZMAN (collectively referred to herein as "Defendants"), and Plaintiff

24
25 26

DEEPANSHA SINGH, a minor, by her General Guardian, Deep Singh (herein~fter "Plaintiff'),

through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an order continuing the hearing on
Defendant District's and USA's dispositive motions set in the above-captioned matter on May 5,

27
28

2010 to May 26, 2010, or as soon thereafter as may be allowed. Such continuance is necessary to
facilitate the recent discussions between Plaintiff and the District regarding potential settlement of
-i-

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; CASE NO. CV 09 4 i 08 EMC

2300301.1

1 this action against the District, and will serve judicial economy in that if a settlement is reached

2 the District's dispositive motion will be unnecessary.

3 The parties further stipulate that all applicable deadlines will be reset to correspond with
4 the new hearing date.
5 Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the accompanying
6 proposed order.

7 IT is SO STIPULATED.
8

i, Alexandra V. Atencio, hereby attest that the below named counsel have authorized me,
9

verbally and by email, to e-sign this document on their behalf.
10
11 DATED: March

29, 2010

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

12
13

14
15

By: lsI Alexandra V. Atencio ALEXANDRA V. ATENCIO Attorneys for Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
DATED: March 29, 2010

16
17
18

19

20
21

By: lsI Thomas R. Green THOMAS R. GREEN Assistant United States Attorney for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DATED: March 29, 2010

ADAMS, NYE, TRAPANI, BECHT, LLP

22
23

24
25

By: lsI Thomas A. Trapani THOMAS A. TRAPANI Attorneys for Defendant JOSHUA WOZMAN

26
27 28

- 2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS: CASE NO. CV 09 4108 EMC
2300301.1

1

DATED: March 29, 2010

THE KEANE LAW FIRM

2
3

By: lsI Christopher Keane CHRISTOPHER KEANE
Attorney for Plaintiff

4

6 ORDER
5

7 The Court, having reviewed the above Stipulation to Continue the Hearing on Defendants'

8 Dispositive Motions, HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
9 The hearing on Defendant Golden Gate Bridge, Highway, and Transportation District's

10 and the United States of America's dispositive motions, previously scheduled for May 5, 2010 at
11 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom: C, 15th Floor, of the U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San

12 Francisco, CA, shall be continued to May 26, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, of
13 the U.S. District Court. All applicable deadlines will be reset to

correspond with the new hearing

14 date
UNIT ED
15

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

16 17

IT is SO ORDERED.

18 Dated:
19

3/30/10

20
21

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

22
23

24
25

26 27
28

-3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; CASE NO. CV 09 4108 EMC
2300301.1

A

C

LI

FO

n M. Che Edwardon. Edward M. Chen H Judge
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

Judge Edward

M. Chen

R NIA

IT IS SO

ORDERED

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

NO

RT U O

NO

RT

H

RT

H