Singh v. United States of America et al
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS HEARING re #32 Stipulation filed by Golden Gate Bridge and Transportation District. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/30/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2010)
1 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
KIMON MANOLIUS - 154971
2 kmanolius@hansonbridgett.com.
ALEXANDRA V. ATENCIO - 22725 I
3 aatencio@hansonbridgett.com
425 Market Street, 26th Floor
4 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 5 Facsimile: . (415) 541-9366
6 Attorneys for Defendant
GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND 7 TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12 DEEPANSHA SINGH, a minor, by her
General Guardian, Deep Singh,
13
No. CV 09 4108 EMC
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)
Plaintiff,
14
ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING
v.
ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE
15
MOTIONS
Action Filed: September 4, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, 17 JOSHUA WOZMAN, and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
The parties in this matter, Defendants GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY, AND
22
23
TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ("District"), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ("USA"), and
JOSHUA WOZMAN (collectively referred to herein as "Defendants"), and Plaintiff
24
25 26
DEEPANSHA SINGH, a minor, by her General Guardian, Deep Singh (herein~fter "Plaintiff'),
through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an order continuing the hearing on
Defendant District's and USA's dispositive motions set in the above-captioned matter on May 5,
27
28
2010 to May 26, 2010, or as soon thereafter as may be allowed. Such continuance is necessary to
facilitate the recent discussions between Plaintiff and the District regarding potential settlement of
-i-
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; CASE NO. CV 09 4 i 08 EMC
2300301.1
1 this action against the District, and will serve judicial economy in that if a settlement is reached
2 the District's dispositive motion will be unnecessary.
3 The parties further stipulate that all applicable deadlines will be reset to correspond with
4 the new hearing date.
5 Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the accompanying
6 proposed order.
7 IT is SO STIPULATED.
8
i, Alexandra V. Atencio, hereby attest that the below named counsel have authorized me,
9
verbally and by email, to e-sign this document on their behalf.
10
11 DATED: March
29, 2010
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
12
13
14
15
By: lsI Alexandra V. Atencio ALEXANDRA V. ATENCIO Attorneys for Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
DATED: March 29, 2010
16
17
18
19
20
21
By: lsI Thomas R. Green THOMAS R. GREEN Assistant United States Attorney for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DATED: March 29, 2010
ADAMS, NYE, TRAPANI, BECHT, LLP
22
23
24
25
By: lsI Thomas A. Trapani THOMAS A. TRAPANI Attorneys for Defendant JOSHUA WOZMAN
26
27 28
- 2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS: CASE NO. CV 09 4108 EMC
2300301.1
1
DATED: March 29, 2010
THE KEANE LAW FIRM
2
3
By: lsI Christopher Keane CHRISTOPHER KEANE
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
6 ORDER
5
7 The Court, having reviewed the above Stipulation to Continue the Hearing on Defendants'
8 Dispositive Motions, HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
9 The hearing on Defendant Golden Gate Bridge, Highway, and Transportation District's
10 and the United States of America's dispositive motions, previously scheduled for May 5, 2010 at
11 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom: C, 15th Floor, of the U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San
12 Francisco, CA, shall be continued to May 26, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, of
13 the U.S. District Court. All applicable deadlines will be reset to
correspond with the new hearing
14 date
UNIT ED
15
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
16 17
IT is SO ORDERED.
18 Dated:
19
3/30/10
20
21
ER
N
D IS T IC T R
OF
22
23
24
25
26 27
28
-3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; CASE NO. CV 09 4108 EMC
2300301.1
A
C
LI
FO
n M. Che Edwardon. Edward M. Chen H Judge
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
LI
FO
Judge Edward
M. Chen
R NIA
IT IS SO
ORDERED
R NIA
O OR IT IS S
DERED
RT U O
NO
RT U O
NO
RT
H
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?