McColm v. Foremost Insurance Company

Filing 187

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

PATRICIA A. MCCOLM,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

No. C 09-04132 SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v.
FOREMOST INSURANCE CO,

12

Defendant.

/

13
14
15
16

On June 2, 2011, defendant Foremost Insurance Co. filed a motion to dismiss. See Doc. 182.
Defendant is hereby ordered to supplement its filing with the following:

17

•

a transcript of the entire deposition;

18

•

the video of the entire deposition; and

19

•

a detailed statement of how defendant’s purported inability to depose plaintiff Patricia

20

McColm has interfered with its ability to defend the case.

21

Defendant’s statement may be in the form of a statement of disputed and undisputed facts, with

22

an explanation of how a completed deposition would or could have resolved certain of the disputed

23

facts. It should state what defenses defendant would have wished to raise for each of plaintiff’s claims,

24

and how it has been prevented from doing so. Defendant shall also explain why defendant chose to

25

terminate the deposition rather than contacting the Court for assistance.

26

Defendant’s supplemental filings are due at 5:00 p.m. on Friday, June 10, 2011. The remainder

27

of the Court’s scheduling order for dispositive motions remains the same. See Doc. 160. Plaintiff must

28

file her opposition by July 1, 2011; defendant’s reply is due July 8, 2011; and the hearing remains

1

scheduled for July 15, 2011.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

Dated: June 7, 2011
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge

7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2