Baker v. Chin & Hensolt, Inc. et al

Filing 43

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 5, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 5, 2010, counsel for plaintiff failed to appear as ordered at a regularly scheduled Case Management Conference in the above-entitled action. Counsel for defendants appeared. Additionally, counsel for plaintiff failed to provide a chambers copy of the Case Management Statement, which failure constitutes the third such failure by plaintiff's counsel to comply with General order 45 and this Court's Standing Orders. (See Second Order Directing Plaintiff to Submit Chambers copy, filed Jan. 28, 2010.) Accordingly, counsel for plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, filed with the Court and served on opposing counsel no later than March 12, 2009, why sanctions, including dismissal, should not be imposed for his failure to comply with Court orders and for failure to prosecute. If counsel for plaintiff fails to timely respond to this Order, sanctions will be imposed, which sanctions may include dismissal of the action pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. v. CHIN & HENSOLT INC., et al., Defendants. / United States District Court RICHARD BAKER, Plaintiff, No. C 09-4168 MMC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In light of the above, the hearing on defendant's Motion to Dismiss, currently scheduled for March 12, 2010, is hereby CONTINUED to March 26, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?