Cosco Container Lines Company Limited v. Hecny Shipping Limited et al

Filing 95

ORDER RE 94 GRANTING STIPULATION TO VACATE AND RESET FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/5/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 3/31/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/28/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)

Download PDF
Cosco Container Lines Company Limited v. Hecny Shipping Limited et al Doc. 95 *E-Filed 3/1/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ROBERTS & KEHAGIARAS LLP ROBERTS & KEHAGIARAS LLP ANDREW D. KEHAGIARAS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 207767) adk@tradeandcargo.com GEORGE P. HASSAPIS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 147072) gph@tradeandcargo.com One World Trade Center Long Beach, CA 90831 Telephone: (310) 642-9800 Facsimile: (310) 868-2923 Attorneys for defendants and third-party plaintiffs HECNY SHIPPING LIMITED and HECNY TRANSPORTATION, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 www.tradeandcargo.com 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COSCO CONTAINER LINES COMPANY LIMITED, Plaintiff, vs. HECNY SHIPPING LIMITED, HECNY TRANSPORTATION INC., EXEL INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION, and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, Defendants. _______________________________ HECNY SHIPPING LIMITED, HECNY TRANSPORTATION INC., Third-Party Plaintiffs, vs. EXEL INTERMODAL INC.; GLOBAL CARGO CONNECTION; WORLD WAY INTERNATIONAL; ROYAL WHITE CEMENT; QINGDAO JUNYANG INT'L LOGISTICS CO.; HARJIT BHAMBRA, an individual; and ROES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 09-04173 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO VACATE AND RESET FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT TIME: DATE: COURTROOM: CMC: 1:30 p.m. March 17, 2011 3, 17th Floor March 24, 2011 JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg TRIAL DATE: July 18, 2011 Z:\Hecny Transportation\COSCO\Sitp Re CMC & MSJ - order.doc [PROPOSED] ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ROBERTS & KEHAGIARAS LLP Third-Party Defendants. ) ) ) 11 www.tradeandcargo.com 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Z:\Hecny Transportation\COSCO\Sitp Re CMC & MSJ - order.doc [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ROBERTS & KEHAGIARAS LLP The stipulation of plaintiff COSCO Container Lines Company Limited ("COSCO"), defendants and third-party plaintiffs Hecny Shipping Limited and Hecny Transportation, Inc., third-party defendants Global Cargo Connection and World Way International Inc., and third-party defendant Royal White Cement, Inc. came on for consideration by the Honorable Richard Seeborg. Court, having considered the parties' stipulation orders The as follows: Good cause appearing, the Court orders the following: 1. The Court hereby vacates the hearing date of COSCO's motion for summary judgment, currently set for 1:30 p.m. on March 17, 2011, and re-sets the same for 1:30 March 31 p.m. on ___________, 2011; and 11 www.tradeandcargo.com 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. 2. The Court hereby vacates the telephonic further case management conference currently set for 10:00 a.m. on March 24, 2011, and re-sets the same for 1:30 p.m. on 10:00 a.m. May 5 ___________, 2011; and The due-date for any further oppositions to COSCO's motion 2011 for summary judgment for shall COSCO's be ___________, shall be and the due-date reply ___________, 2011. The briefing schedule shall comport with Civil Local Rule 7-3. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2/28 Dated: ___________, 2011 ____________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 1 Z:\Hecny Transportation\COSCO\Sitp Re CMC & MSJ - order.doc [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?