Podaras v. City of Menlo Park et al

Filing 16

ORDER re 14 . (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2009)

Case3:09-cv-04199-SI Document14

Filed11/20/09 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

SCHIFF HARDIN LLP BRUCE A. WAGMAN (CSB No. 159987) [e-mail] LISA C. MCCURDY (CSB No. 228755) [e-mail] One Market, Spear Street Tower Thirty-Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff CHARLES PODARAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CHARLES PODARAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MENLO PARK; DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRIAN DONNELLAN; OFFICER BURKE BRUTTIG and DOES 1-25, inclusive. Defendants. Case No. CV 09-04199 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S SUBMISSION OF CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Defendants City of Menlo Park and Burke Bruttig have filed a joint motion to dismiss Plaintiff's action, and Defendant Deputy District Attorney Brian Donnellan has filed a separate motion to dismiss. Because there are significant identical factual and legal issues presented by the two motions, and in the interest of judicial economy, the parties propose the following stipulation. Plaintiff Charles Podaras and defendants City of Menlo Park, Deputy District Attorney Brian Donnellan, and Officer Burke Bruttig, through their respective
Case No. CV 09-04199 SI

STIPULATION

Case3:09-cv-04199-SI Document14

Filed11/20/09 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

attorneys, hereby stipulate and jointly move this Court to enter an Order allowing Mr. Podaras to file one consolidated opposition brief of no more than 30 pages in length in response to the two motions to dismiss filed in response to Plaintiff's Complaint, one filed on behalf of City of Menlo Park and Burke Bruttig, and the other filed on behalf of Deputy District Attorney Brian Donnellan.

SO STIPULATED. Dated: November 20, 2009 SCHIFF HARDIN LLP

By: /s/ Lisa C. McCurdy Bruce A. Wagman Lisa C. McCurdy Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: November 20, 2009 McCLURE & FLEGEL, LLP

By: /s/ Nicolas A. Flegel Nicolas A. Flegel Attorneys for Defendants City of Menlo Park and Officer Burke Bruttig Dated: November 20, 2009 COUNTY COUNSEL FOR COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

By: /s/ Carol L. Woodward Carol L. Woodward Attorney for Defendant Deputy District Attorney Brian Donnellan ///
///

-2-

Case No. CV 09-04199 SI

STIPULATION

Case3:09-cv-04199-SI Document14

Filed11/20/09 Page3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 DECLARATION: I, Lisa McCurdy, do hereby attest that that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories identified above. Dated: November 20, 2009 SCHIFF HARDIN LLP

By: /s/ Lisa C. McCurdy Bruce A. Wagman Lisa C. McCurdy Attorneys for Plaintiff

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November __, 2009 By: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Court

SF\9508711.1

-3-

Case No. CV 09-04199 SI

STIPULATION