Zhu v. UCBH Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 153

ORDER Regarnding 151 Stipulation to Extend Page Limits. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on November 15, 2010. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2010)

Zhu v. UCBH Holdings, Inc. et al

Doc. 153

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document151

Filed11/12/10 Page1 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

JORDAN ETH (CA SBN 121617) [e-mail] ANNA ERICKSON WHITE (CA SBN 161385) [e-mail] CRAIG D. MARTIN (CA SBN 168195) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street, 32nd Floor San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Individual Defendants Craig S. On; Dennis Wu; Joseph J. Jou; Pin Pin Chau; Li-Lin Ko; Godwin Wong; David Ng; Daniel P. Riley; and Richard Li-Chung Wang UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KYUNG CHO; REX DECHAKUL; AND DAVID HWANG; INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs,

Master Case No. (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION

CV-09-4208-JSW

17 v. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UCBH HOLDINGS, INC.; THOMAS S. WU; EBRAHIM SHABUDIN; CRAIG ON; DENNIS WU; ROBERT NAGEL; JOHN M. KERR; DANIEL M. GAUTSCH; DOUGLAS MITCHELL; BURTON D. THOMPSON; JOHN CINDEREY; JOSEPH J. JOU; PIN PIN CHAU; LI-LIN KO; JAMES KWOK; QINGYUAN WAN; GODWIN WONG; DAVID NG; DANIEL P. RILEY; and RICHARD LI-CHUNG WANG, Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE BRIEFS RE MOTION TO DISMISS IN EXCESS OF 15 PAGES Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White Courtroom: 11, 19th Floor

STIP. & [PROP] ORDER TO FILE BRIEFS RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN EXCESS OF 15 PAGES

Case No. CV 09-04208 JSW sf-2906534
Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document151

Filed11/12/10 Page2 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, on August 10, 2010, Lead Plaintiff Kyung Cho, Rex Dechakul, and David Hwang (collectively "Plaintiffs") filed the Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws in the above-entitled matter; WHEREAS, Thomas S. Wu, Ebrahim Shabudin, Craig On, Dennis Wu, Robert Nagel, John M. Kerr, Daniel M. Gautsch, Douglas Mitchell, Burton D. Thompson, Joseph J. Jou, Pin Pin Chau, Li-Lin Ko, Godwin Wong, David Ng, Daniel P. Riley, and Richard Li-Chung Wang (collectively "Defendants") are scheduled to file their motions to dismiss on November 19, 2010, Plaintiffs' oppositions to the motions to dismiss are due on January 7, 2011, and Defendants' replies in support of their motions to dismiss are due on January 28, 2011; WHEREAS, all of the Defendants intend on filings motions to dismiss, with certain defendants making their arguments together in a single motion; WHEREAS, although Civil Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3 allow for the filing of briefs up to 25 pages in length, this Court's Standing Order limits briefs on motions to dismiss to 15 pages; WHEREAS, the parties have conferred, and believe that in light of the number and complexity of issues presented by the Defendants' anticipated motions to dismiss, including the fact that certain motions to dismiss will be filed on behalf of multiple defendants, it will be helpful to the parties and to the Court, to permit the Defendants to file opening briefs on their respective motions not to exceed 25 pages, for Plaintiffs to file an opposition brief not to exceed 25 pages for each of the motions to dismiss, and for Defendants to file reply briefs not to exceed 15 pages, inclusive of summaries of argument; Accordingly, subject to Court approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the undersigned parties that, Defendants may file opening briefs not to exceed 25 pages for their respective motions to dismiss, Plaintiffs may file an opposition brief not to exceed 25 pages for each motion to dismiss, and Defendants may file reply briefs not to exceed 15 pages, exclusive of title pages, indices of cases, tables of contents, and exhibits, but inclusive of summaries of arguments.

STIP. & [PROP] ORDER TO FILE BRIEFS RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN EXCESS OF 15 PAGES

Case No. CV 09-04208 JSW sf-2906534

1

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document151

Filed11/12/10 Page3 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: November 12, 2010

JORDAN ETH ANNA ERICKSON WHITE CRAIG D. MARTIN MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Anna Erickson White ANNA ERICKSON WHITE Attorneys for Individual Defendants Craig S. On; Dennis Wu; Joseph J. Jou; Pin Pin Chau; Li-Lin Ko; Godwin Wong; David Ng; Daniel P. Riley; and Richard Li-Chung Wang Dated: November 12, 2010 LAURENCE M. ROSEN PHILLIP KIM (pro hac vice) THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.

By:

/s/ Phillip Kim PHILLIP KIM Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

Dated: November 12, 2010

TIMOTHY P. CRUDO STEVEN M. BAUER MATTHEW C. HELTON LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By: /s/ Timothy P. Crudo TIMOTHY P. CRUDO Attorneys for Defendant Thomas S. Wu Dated: November 12, 2010 JAMES A. LASSART ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY LLP

By:

/s/ James A. Lassart JAMES A. LASSART Attorneys for Defendant Ebrahim Shabudin

STIP. & [PROP] ORDER TO FILE BRIEFS RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN EXCESS OF 15 PAGES

Case No. CV 09-04208 JSW sf-2906534

2

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document151

Filed11/12/10 Page4 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: November 12, 2010

DANIEL J. BERGESON GRACE Y. PARK BERGESON LLP

By: /s/ Grace Y. Park GRACE Y. PARK Attorneys for Defendants Douglas Mitchell; Daniel M. Gautsch; and Robert Nagel Dated: November 12, 2010 WILLIAM P. KEANE ANTHONY P. SCHOENBERG FARAELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

By: /s/ Anthony P. Schoenberg ANTHONY P. SCHOENBERG Attorneys for Defendant John M. Kerr Dated: November 12, 2010 JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN MIKAL J. CONDON K&L GATES LLP

By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Bornstein JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN Attorneys for Defendant Burton D. Thompson

STIP. & [PROP] ORDER TO FILE BRIEFS RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN EXCESS OF 15 PAGES

Case No. CV 09-04208 JSW sf-2906534

3

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document151

Filed11/12/10 Page6 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

[PROPOSED] ORDER If Defendants agree to file one consolidated motion, the motion and opposition to that motion may Upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. be up to 25 pages. Otherwise, all motions must not exceed the fifteen page limit restriction. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 15 Dated: _______________, 2010 HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

STIP. & [PROP] ORDER TO FILE BRIEFS RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN EXCESS OF 15 PAGES

Case No. CV 09-04208 JSW sf-2906534

5