Zhu v. UCBH Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 205

ORDER GRANTING 204 Stipulation Continuing Defendants' Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs' Consolidated Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/16/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document204

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Filed09/14/11 Page1 of 3

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Steven M. Bauer (SBN 135067)
([e-mail])
Timothy P. Crudo (Bar No. 143835)
([e-mail])
Brendan K. Kelleher (Bar No. 275883)
([e-mail])
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.395.8095
Attorneys for Defendant
THOMAS S. WU

8
9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13
14

KYUNG CHO; REX DECHAKUL; AND
DAVID HWANG, INDIVIDUALLY AND
ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. CV-09-4208-JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’
CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

v.
CLASS ACTION
UCBH HOLDINGS, INC.; THOMAS S.
WU; EBRAHIM SHABUDIN; CRAIG ON;
DENNIS WU; ROBERT NAGEL; JOHN M.
KERR; DANIEL M. GAUTSCH; DOUGLAS
MITCHELL; BURTON D. THOMPSON;
JOHN CINDEREY; JOSEPH J. JOU; PIN
PIN CHAU; LI-LIN KO; QINGYUAN
WAN; GODWIN WONG; DAVID NG;
DANIEL P. RILEY; and RICHARD LICHUNG WANG, and JOHN DOES 1-10,
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
SF\874608.1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

CASE NO. CV-09-4208-JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document204

Filed09/14/11 Page2 of 3

STIPULATION

1

WHEREAS, the parties to the above-referenced matter (the “Parties”) are

2
3

engaged in ongoing mediation before Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) in an effort to resolve the

4

disputes at issue in this lawsuit;
WHEREAS, the current deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’

5
6

Consolidated Second Amended Complaint is September 19, 2011;

7

WHEREAS, the Parties believe it would promote efficiency and the conservation

8

of the Court’s and the Parties’ resources to stay this lawsuit for a period of time in order to allow

9

the Parties to continue to negotiate the terms and conditions of a final agreement;
THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby

10
11

STIPULATE AND AGREE that:

12

1.

13

The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Second

Amended Complaint is continued ninety days, until December 19, 2011.

14
Authority for and concurrence in the filing of this stipulated request has been

15
16

obtained from each of the signatories, pursuant to General Order 45 (X)(B).

17
18

Dated: September 14, 2011

19

THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
By

20
21
22

Dated: September 14, 2011

/s/ Phillip Kim
Phillip Kim
Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Kyung Cho and
Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

23
By

24
25

/s/ Timothy P. Crudo
Timothy P. Crudo
Attorneys for Defendant Thomas S. Wu

26
27
28
1
SF\874608.1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

CASE NO. CV-09-4208-JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document204

1

Dated: September 14, 2011

Filed09/14/11 Page3 of 3

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

2
By

3
4
5

/s/ Anna Erickson White
Anna Erickson White
Attorneys for Defendants Craig On, Dennis
Wu, Li-Lin Ko, Joseph J. Jou, David S. Ng,
Daniel P. Riley, Richard Li-Chung Wang,
Godwin S. Wong, and Pin Pin Chau

6
7

Dated: September 14, 2011

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

8
By

9
10
11

Dated: September 14, 2011

/s/ Anthony P. Schoenberg
Anthony P. Schoenberg
Attorneys for Defendant John M. Kerr

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

12
By

13
14
15

Dated: September 14, 2011

/s/ James A. Lassert
James A. Lassert
Attorneys for Defendant Ebrahim Shabudin

BERGESON LLP

16
By

17
18

/s/ Daniel J. Bergeson
Daniel J. Bergeson
Attorneys for Defendant Daniel M. Gautsch,
Douglas Mitchell, and Robert Nagel

19
Dated: September 14, 2011

K&L GATES LLP

20
21

By

22

/s/ Jeffrey L. Bornstein
Jeffrey L. Bornstein
Attorneys for Defendant Burton Thompson

23
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

September 16, 2011
Dated: ___________________________

26

THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Court Judge

27
28
2
SF\874608.1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

CASE NO. CV-09-4208-JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT