Zhu v. UCBH Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 216

ORDER GRANTING 215 Stipulation Re: Filing of Third Amended Complaint and Response Thereto. Amended Pleadings due by 1/9/2012. Motions due by 2/23/2012. Replies due by 5/9/2012. Responses due by 4/9/2012. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/8/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2011)

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document215

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Filed12/07/11 Page1 of 5

JORDAN ETH (CA SBN 121617)
[e-mail]
ANNA ERICKSON WHITE (CA SBN 161385)
[e-mail]
CRAIG D. MARTIN (CA SBN 168195)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street, 32nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone:
415.268.7000
Facsimile:
415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendants
Dennis Wu, Joseph J. Jou, Pin Pin Chau, Li-Lin Ko,
Godwin Wong, David Ng, Daniel P. Riley and
Richard Li-Chung Wang

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15

KYUNG CHO; REX DECHAKUL; AND
DAVID HWANG; INDIVIDUALLY AND ON
BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY
SITUATED,

Master Case No. CV-09-4208-JSW
(Consolidated)
CLASS ACTION

16
Plaintiffs,
17
v.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

UCBH HOLDINGS, INC.; THOMAS S. WU;
EBRAHIM SHABUDIN; CRAIG ON;
DENNIS WU; ROBERT NAGEL;
JOHN M. KERR; DANIEL M. GAUTSCH;
DOUGLAS MITCHELL; BURTON D.
THOMPSON; JOHN CINDEREY; JOSEPH J.
JOU; PIN PIN CHAU; LI-LIN KO; JAMES
KWOK; QINGYUAN WAN; GODWIN WONG;
DAVID NG; DANIEL P. RILEY; and RICHARD
LI-CHUNG WANG,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: FILING OF THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
RESPONSE THERETO
[Civil L.R. 6-1(b)]
Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White
Courtroom: 11, 19th Floor

Defendants.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO
Case No. CV 09-04208 JSW
sf-3074696

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document215

1

Filed12/07/11 Page2 of 5

STIPULATION

2

WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011, the Court issued an Order dismissing the Consolidated

3

Amended Complaint and granting Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint on or before June

4

24, 2011;

5
6
7
8
9
10

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ deadline to file an amended complaint was extended to July 29,
2011;
WHEREAS, on July 29, 2011, Plaintiffs filed the Consolidated Second Amended
Complaint;
WHEREAS, Defendants’ deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Second
Amended Complaint was extended to December 19, 2011;

11

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs intend to amend their complaint;

12

WHEREAS, Defendants in this action do not oppose the filing of an amended complaint;

13

WHEREAS, Defendants, by not opposing the filing of an amended complaint and by

14

stipulating to the filing of an amended complaint, do not concede that Plaintiffs’ Consolidated

15

Second Amended Complaint or any amended complaint adequately pleads a claim, but rather

16

expressly reserve all arguments and defenses they may have as to any amended complaint;

17
18

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b) and subject
to Court approval, as follows:

19

1.

20

January 9, 2012.

21

2.

22
23
24

Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Third Amended Complaint shall be filed on or before

Defendants’ responses to the Consolidated Third Amended Complaint shall be

filed on or before February 23, 2012.
3.

If Defendants file motions to dismiss the Consolidated Third Amended Complaint,

Plaintiffs’ opposition briefs will be due on or before April 9, 2012.

25

4.

Defendants’ reply briefs will be due on or before May 9, 2012.

26

5.

Defendants shall notice their motions for hearing on June 1, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

27

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO
Case No. CV 09-04208 JSW
sf-3074696

1

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document215

1

Dated: December 7, 2011

Filed12/07/11 Page3 of 5

THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.

2
3

By:

4

/s/ Phillip Kim
PHILLIP KIM
Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Kyung Cho
and Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

5
6
7

Dated: December 7, 2011

8
9

JORDAN ETH
ANNA ERICKSON WHITE
CRAIG D. MARTIN
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

10
By: /s/ Anna Erickson White
ANNA ERICKSON WHITE

11
12

Attorneys for Dennis Wu, Joseph J. Jou,
Pin Pin Chau, Li-Lin Ko, Godwin Wong,
David Ng, Daniel P. Riley and Richard
Li-Chung Wang, Craig On

13
14
15
16

Dated: December 7, 2011

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

17
By:

18
19

/s/ Timothy P. Crudo
Timothy P. Crudo
Attorneys for Defendant Thomas S. Wu

20
21

Dated: December 7, 2011

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

22
23

By:

24

/s/ Anthony P. Schoenberg
Anthony P. Schoenberg

25

Attorneys for Defendant John M. Kerr

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO
Case No. CV 09-04208 JSW
sf-3074696

2

Case3:09-cv-04208-JSW Document215

1

Dated: December 7, 2011

Filed12/07/11 Page4 of 5

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

2
3

By:

4

/s/ James A. Lassart
James A. Lassart
Attorneys for Defendant Ebrahim
Shabudin

5
6
7

Dated: December 7, 2011

BERGESON LLP

8
9

By:

10

/s/ Daniel J. Bergeson
Daniel J. Bergeson
Attorneys for Defendants Daniel M.
Gautsch, Douglas Mitchell, and Robert
Nagel

11
12
13
14

Dated: December 7, 2011

K&L GATES LLP

15
By:

16
17

/s/ Jeffrey L. Bornstein
Jeffrey L. Bornstein
Attorneys for Defendant Burton
Thompson

18
19
20
21

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

Dated: December 8, 2011
_____________________

24
25

The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO
Case No. CV 09-04208 JSW
sf-3074696

3