Zhu v. UCBH Holdings, Inc. et al
Filing
302
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY STAY. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/13/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KYUNG CHO, ET AL., Individually and On
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
10
No. C 09-4208 JSW
11
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Plaintiffs,
ORDER REGARDING
DISCOVERY STAY
12
UCBH HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.,
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
The Court has received the response from Defendants John Cinderey, Daniel M.
17
Gautsch, Joseph Jou, John M. Kerr, Li-Lin Ko, Douglas Mitchell, Robert Nagel, David Ng,
18
Craig S. On, Daniel P. Riley, Ebrahim Shabudin, Burton D. Thompson, Godwin S. Wong,
19
Dennis Wu, Thomas S. Wu, Thomas Yu, and Richard Li-Chung Wang (“Individual
20
Defendants”) to the Court’s Order to Show Cause. In light of the consent by the Individual
21
Defendants to produce the documents that they have already provided to the FDIC, DOJ and the
22
SEC, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the Individual Defendants to produce these documents to
23
Plaintiffs by no later than November 26, 2012. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that all further
24
discovery in this action is STAYED, including initial disclosures. The Court will reset a
25
deadline for initial disclosures once the stay has been lifted. By February 22, 2012, the parties
26
//
27
///
28
///
1
shall meet and confer to determine whether the stay should be lifted or extended and shall file a
2
stipulation or a status report indicating their respective positions if they cannot agree.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: November 13, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?