Goodman v. Numonyx B.V.

Filing 43

Stipulated ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 07/07/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2010)

Goodman v. Numonyx B.V.

Doc. 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

David Fink (pro hac vice) FINK & JOHNSON 7519 Apache Plume Houston, TX 77071 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 713-729-4951 Email: [e-mail] Duncan M. McNeill (Cal. Bar No. 136416) 1514 Van Dyke Avenue San Francisco, CA 94124 Telephone: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff James B. Goodman

RALPH ZAPPALA, SB# 102052 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP One Sansome Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] NICHOLAS B. CLIFFORD, JR. (pro hac) MICHAEL H. LONGMEYER (pro hac) ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP One Metropolitan Square, Suite 2600 St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2740 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant NUMONYX B.V.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 09-CV-4243 MHP STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff, vs. NUMONYX B.V., Defendant.

Case No.: 09 CV-4243 MHP STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff JAMES B. GOODMAN ("Goodman") and Defendant NUMONYX B.V. ("Numonyx B.V.") submit this Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice. It has come to the attention of Goodman that Numonyx B.V. has been purchased by a licensee of Goodman and since that acquisition, Numonyx B.V. has become licensed under the patent-in-suit. In addition, Numonyx B.V. has represented to Goodman that certain psram products (a component of the alleged infringement) used outside the United States by Numonyx B.V. in the accused products in the Complaint were purchased from other licensees of Goodman. Hence, Goodman has concluded that if there is any liability of Numonyx B.V. under the patent-insuit, the potential damages would be insignificant as compared to the cost of litigation. Therefore, as long as Numonyx B.V. remains licensed for the patent-in-suit, Numonyx B.V. has no liability for infringement of the patent-in-suit. Therefore, the Parties Stipulate and Agree that all claims and counterclaims in the above litigation should be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees and expenses.

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 09-CV-4243 MHP STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 By: /s/ Nicholas B. Clifford, Jr. Nicholas B. Clifford, Jr Attorney for Defendant Numonyx B. V. ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Nicholas B. Clifford, Jr., attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 6, 2010 in St. Louis, Missouri. Dated July 6, 2010 By: /s/ Nicholas B. Clifford, Jr. Nicholas B. Clifford, Jr ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP Dated July 6, 2010 By: /s/ David Fink David Fink Respectfully submitted, FINK & JOHNSON

Attorneys for Plaintiff James B. Goodman

24 25 26

UNIT ED

S

23

So Ordered:

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O
l

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

27
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 09-CV-4243 MHP STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ER

N

07/07/10

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

arilyn Judge M

H. Pate

R NIA

NO

RT

H