Ultra Products, Inc. v. Antec, Inc. et al
Filing
374
ORDER RE: 363 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/28/11. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011)
Streak Products Inc v. Antec, Inc. et al
Doc. 37
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
*E-Filed 3/28/11*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION STREAK PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ANTEC, INC., et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ Plaintiff Streak Products filed an administrative motion requesting leave to file excess pages. In that motion, plaintiff complained that defendant Antec filed a large volume of documents and evidence in support of its motions for summary judgment but relied directly only on some of it. In its opposition brief, plaintiff included objections to the evidence cited in defendant's motion but requested leave to file two appendices containing objections to the remainder of defendant's filing. Antec duly filed an objection to Streak's request, and asked that the Court strike the appendices from the record. Any documents not cited to, or identified and relied upon in defendant's briefs shall be disregarded and deemed inadmissible as irrelevant. Accordingly, plaintiff's request to file specific objections in excess of the page limit is moot and the appendices are stricken. No. C 09-4255 RS ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
NO. C 09-4255 RS ORDER
Dockets.Justia
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: 3/28/11 RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
NO. C 09-4255 RS ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?