Ultra Products, Inc. v. Antec, Inc. et al

Filing 391

ORDER RE 390 Concerning Physical Evidence Submitted in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/26/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)

*E-Filed 5/26/11*

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

MOUNT, SPELMAN & FINGERMAN, P.C.
RIVERPARK TOWER, SUITE 1650
333 WEST SAN CARLOS STREET
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95110-2740
TELEPHONE [phone]

11
12

Daniel S. Mount, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 77517)
Kathryn G. Spelman, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 154512)
Daniel H. Fingerman, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 229683)
Kevin M. Pasquinelli, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 246985)
On Lu, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 242693)
Jing H. Cherng, Esq. (Cal. Bar. No. 265017)
Mount, Spelman & Fingerman, P.C.
RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650
333 West San Carlos Street
San Jose CA 95110-2740
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail], [e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Antec Inc., Enermax Technology Corp.,
Enermax USA Corp., FSP Group USA Corp., Mushkin Inc., Sea Sonic
Electronics Co. Ltd., Seasonic Electronics Inc., SPI Electronic Co. Ltd.,
Tagan Technology Co., Topower Computer Industrial Co. Ltd.,
Topower Computer (USA) Inc.

13

United States District Court
Northern District of California, San Francisco Division

14
15

Streak Products Inc.,

16
17

Plaintiff,
vs.

24

Antec Inc., Channel Well Technologies
Co. Ltd., Enermax Technology Corp.,
Enermax USA Corp., FSP Group USA
Corp., Magnell Associate Inc. d/b/a ABS
Computer Technologies Inc., Mushkin
Inc., Newegg Inc., Sea Sonic Electronics
Co. Ltd., Seasonic Electronics Inc., SPI
Electronic Co. Ltd. d/b/a FSP Group Inc.,
Tagan Technology Co., Thermaltake
Technology Co. Ltd., Thermaltake Inc.,
Topower Computer Industrial Co. Ltd.,
Topower Computer (USA) Inc. d/b/a EPower Technology/PCMCIS

25

Defendants

18
19
20
21
22
23

26
27
28

Case No. 3:09-cv-04255-RS-HRL
[Proposed] Order Concerning Physical Evidence
Submitted in Support of Motions for Summary
Judgment

1

Defendants brought several computers as exhibits to the Motion for Summary Judgment

2

hearing, held on August 11, 2011. During the hearing, counsel for Defendants submitted the

3

following exhibits in support of their arguments and requested that counsel retain custody of those

4

exhibits. For good cause, the request is GRANTED. The following exhibits, labeled by exhibit

5

number, are deemed submitted and counsel for Defendants is ordered to retain custody of the

6

exhibits, identified below as labeled in the hearing, in the instant case until further notice:

7
8
9
10

MOUNT, SPELMAN & FINGERMAN, P.C.
RIVERPARK TOWER, SUITE 1650
333 WEST SAN CARLOS STREET
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95110-2740
TELEPHONE [phone]

11
12
13

Exhibit 1.

HP i2000 computer (S/N: SG21920584), depicted in Appendix A to Motion

for Summary Judgment against Claim 1, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Exhibit 2.

Intel BS 460 computer, depicted in Appendix B to Motion for Summary

Judgment against Claim 1, attached hereto as Exhibit B.
Exhibit 3.

Intel BS 460 computer, depicted in Appendix C to Motion for Summary

Judgment against Claim 1, attached hereto as Exhibit C.
Exhibit 4.

IBM Personal System/2 Model 60 computer (S/N: 72-8184178), depicted in

14

Appendix A to Motion for Summary Judgment against Claim 4, attached hereto as

15

Exhibit D.

16

Exhibit 5.

Apple Macintosh Quadra 950 computer (S/N: XB51909H677), depicted in

17

Appendix B to Motion for Summary Judgment against Claim 4, attached hereto as

18

Exhibit E.

19

Exhibit 8.

Ultra Power Bar product and Ultra m998 Computer Case depicted in the

20

Declaration of Daniel H. Fingerman in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment for

21

False Marking, attached hereto as Exhibit F.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

Date: 5/26/11
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

26
27
28
Case No. 3:09-cv-04255-RS-HRL
[Proposed] Order Concerning Physical Evidence Submitted in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment

Page 1