Ultra Products, Inc. v. Antec, Inc. et al
Filing
424
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/7/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection set for 12/3/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg . Jury Trial set for 12/3/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 11/15/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/9/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011)
*E-Filed 9/9/2011*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
12
STREAK PRODUCTS INC,
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
No. C 09-04255 RS
CASE MANAGEMENT
SCHEDULING ORDER
ANTEC, INC. ET AL,
16
17
Defendant.
____________________________________/
18
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case
19
Management Conference on September 8, 2011. After considering the Joint Case Management
20
Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and
21
good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
22
1.
DISCOVERY.
23
On or before May 29, 2012, all non-expert discovery shall be completed by the parties.
24
Discovery shall limited as follows: (a) ten (10) non-expert depositions per party; (b) twenty-five
25
(25) interrogatories per party, including all discrete subparts; (c) a reasonable number of requests
26
for production of documents or for inspection per party; and (d) a reasonable number of requests for
27
admission per party.
28
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
NO. C 09-04255 RS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3.
EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions
shall proceed as follows:
A. On or before June 26, 2012, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
B. On or before July 17, 2012, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and reports in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
C. On or before August 7, 2012, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.
4.
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. A Further Case Management
Conference shall be held on June 7, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall file a Joint Case
12
Management Statement at least one week prior to the Conference.
13
14
15
5.
PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to
Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than October 18, 2012.
6.
PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. At a time convenient to both, counsel shall meet and
16
confer to discuss preparation of a joint pretrial statement, and on or before November 8, 2012,
17
counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement.
18
7.
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The final pretrial conference will be held on
19
November 22, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450
20
Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Each party or lead counsel who will try the case
21
shall attend personally.
22
8.
TRIAL DATE. Jury trial shall commence on December 3, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., in
23
Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
24
California.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
NO. C 09-4255 RS
27
28
2
1
2
DATED: 9/9/11
_______________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
NO. C 09-4255 RS
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?