Garcia v. Haviland

Filing 22

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/28/10. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2010)

Download PDF
Garcia v. Haviland Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C 09-4264 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL *E-Filed 12/28/10* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JAVIER FRANK GARCIA, Petitioner, v. J. W. HAVILAND, Warden, Respondent. / No. C 09-4264 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL This is a federal habeas corpus action filed by a pro se state prisoner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner, having submitted a habeas petition containing exhausted and unexhausted claims, was ordered to inform the Court within 30 days of his choice whether to dismiss, proceed with, or stay his petition. More than 30 days have passed, and petitioner has not informed the Court of his choice. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of respondent, and close the file. // // // Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A certificate of appealability will not issue. Petitioner has not shown "that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 28, 2010 RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 2 No. C 09-4264 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?