Bilodeau v. Viegas et al

Filing 39

ORDER CLOSING CONSOLIDATED CASES FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY. Semelis v. Richardson, Case No. 09-4599 MMC, and Mello v Richardson, Case No. 09-5137 MMC, are closed for statistical purposes only. Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of any action, and, should further proceedings therein become necessary or desirable in either Case No. 09-4599 MMC or Case No. 09-5137 MMC, any party may initiate them in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 3, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re IMMERSION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION ___________________________________ This Document Relates To: Case Nos. C-09-4599 (Semelis) and C-09-5137 (Mello) /

Master File No. C-09-4291 MMC ORDER CLOSING CONSOLIDATED CASES FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY

United States District Court

By order filed November 17, 2009, the following three cases were consolidated for all purposes, with the consolidated action being titled In re Immersion Corporation Derivative Litigation, C-09-4291 MMC: Bilodeau v. Viegas, Case No. 09-4291 MMC Semelis v. Richardson, Case No. 09-4599 MMC Mello v Richardson, Case No. 09-5137 MMC In light of the consolidation, the parties have been directed, pursuant to the Court's order of November 17, 2009, to file all further filings in Case No. C-09-4291. Consequently, there appears to be no reason at this time to maintain the remainder of the cases as open files for statistical purposes. Accordingly, the above-referenced cases, with the exception of Case No. 09-4291 MMC, are hereby CLOSED for statistical purposes only. //

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of any action, and, should further proceedings therein become necessary or desirable in either Case No. 09-4599 MMC or Case No. 09-5137 MMC, any party may initiate them in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2010

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

2