Joltid Limited v. Skype Technologies S.A. et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendants Silver Lake Partners, L.P., Silver Lake Partners II, L.P., Silver Lake Partners III, L.P., Silver Lake Partners Mangagement Company, L.L.C., Silver Lake Management Company III, L.L.C., Michelangelo ("Mike") Volpi, Andreessen Horowitz LLC, and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Silver Lake Management Company III, LLC, Silver Lake Partners, Silver Lake Partners II, LP, Silver Lake Partners III, LP, Silver Lake Partners Management Company, LLC. (Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 10/26/2009)

Download PDF
Joltid Limited v. Skype Technologies S.A. et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GERALD C. STERNS (Bar No. 029976) BRENDA D. POSADA (Bar No. 152480) STERNS & WALKER 901 Clay Street Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 267-0500 Facsimile: (510) 267-0506 Attorney for Plaintiffs GILBERTO BRAHA YAEL BRAHA and MICHAEL BRAHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBRA MILLER and MICHAEL DOBLER, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., a ) Corporation, and AIR FRANCE, a French ) Corporation, and the THE BOEING ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) GILBERTO BRAHA individually and as personal representative of IARDENYTH TITO BRAHA, decedent, for the benefit of decedent's estate and surviving heirs, YAEL BRAHA and MICHAEL BRAHA, Plaintiffs, vs. DELTA AIRLINES, INC., a corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No: C02-1693 VRW Case No: C05-01544 WHA MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASE SHOULD BE RELATED [L.R. 3-12] TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that plaintiffs GILBERTO BRAHA individually and as personal representative of IARDENYTH TITO BRAHA, decedent, for the benefit of decedent's estate and 1 MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASE SHOULD BE RELATED Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 surviving heirs, YAEL BRAHA and MICHAEL BRAHA hereby move the Court, pursuant to L.R. 3-12, to consider whether their above-captioned purposes including trial. Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-12(b), the Honorable Vaughn R. Walker has deemed other actions pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California as well as throughout the United States under the Multi-District Judicial Panel, who created MDL No. 04-1606 VRW, as being related where the plaintiff alleges he or she has "experienced deep vein thrombosis secondary to the conditions" which he or she experienced on a commercial flight. STATEMENT OF RELATIONSHIP 1. The first-filed action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California containing allegations of "deep vein thrombosis" ("DVT") was Miller, et al. v. Continental Airlines, Inc., et al., Case No. C-02-1693 VRW, and is pending before the Honorable Vaughn R. Walker ("the Miller Action"). The Miller Action was originally filed on April 9, 2002. The defendants in the Miller Action are Continental Airlines, Inc., Air France, and The Boeing Company. Plaintiffs are represented by O'Reilly, Collins and Danko. Plaintiff Miller alleges that on April 28, 2001 she "experienced deep vein thrombosis secondary to the conditions she experienced on her long economy flight from Paris, France to Newark, New Jersey; and from Newark, New Jersey to San Francisco International Airport." Miller Fifth Am. Complaint at ¶12. Plaintiff Miller's spouse alleges a claim for loss of consortium. 2. On August 21, 2003, Judge Walker found that nine (9) cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller action. case is deemed related by this court, for all 2 MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASE SHOULD BE RELATED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 3. On August 22, 2003, Judge Walker found that one other case containing allegations of DVT was related to the Miller Action. 4. On August 29, 2003, Judge Walker found that another case containing allegations of DVT was related to the Miller action.1 5. On September 12, 2003, Judge Walker found that another case containing allegations of DVT was related to the Miller Action. 6. On October 29, 2003, Judge Walker found that five (5) more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 7. On December 22, 2003, Judge Walker found that more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 8. On February 13, 2004, Judge Walker found that three (3) more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 9. On March 12, 2004, Judge Walker found that two (2) more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 10. On June 18, 2004, Judge Walker found that one (1) more case containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 11. On October 1, 2004, Judge Walker found that three (3) more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 12. On October 4, 2004, Judge Walker found that two (2) more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 13. On October 10, 2004, Judge Walker found that two (2) more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. The August 29 Order mistakenly states that Wylie v. American Airlines, Inc. is the low-numbered case. The case number C-02-1693, however, is for the Miller Action. 3 MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASE SHOULD BE RELATED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14. On October 29, 2004, Judge Walker found that one (1) more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 15. On December 14, 2004, Judge Walker found that two (2) more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 16. On January 28, 2005, Judge Walker found that two (2) more cases containing allegations of DVT were related to the Miller Action. 17. On June 25, 2004, a TRANSFER ORDER from Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, was issued by the Honorable WM. Terrell Hodges, transferring actions to the Northern District of California creating MDL No. 04-1606 VRW. A true and correct copy of said order is hereto attached as Exhibit A. 18. Plaintiffs herein, GILBERTO BRAHA, individually and as personal representative of IARDENYTH TITO BRAHA, decedent, YAEL BRAHA and MICHAEL BRAHA, allege that on or about September 23, 2003, Plaintiff IARDENYTH TITO BRAHA developed DVT and/or a Pulmonary Embolism (PE) and other medical complications, which were proximately and legally caused by DELTA AIRLINES, INC., as set forth above as a result of the conditions she experienced on her flight from San Francisco, California to Rome, Italy, which resulted in her death. The defendant in this action is DELTA AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiffs are represented by Sterns & Walker, 901 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94607. GROUNDS FOR NOTICE OF RELATED CASES 19. In the Braha action, as with the other DVT actions, the plaintiffs allege that the air carrier defendant(s) and aircraft manufacturer are liable for "deep vein thrombosis" caused by 4 MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASE SHOULD BE RELATED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 commercial flights. Because the Braha Action also involves questions of law regarding a similar event, assignment of this matter to the Hon. Vaughn R. Walker would avoid the duplication of labor, expense and/or conflicting results within the same jurisdiction. Thus, pursuant to Judge Walker's previous orders regarding DVT cases, this case should also be deemed related to the Miller Action pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-12(b). Dated: Dated: April 21, 2005 GERALD C. STERNS (Bar No. 029976) BRENDA D. POSADA (Bar No.152480) STERNS & WALKER By: ______________________________ Brenda D. Posada Attorneys for Plaintiffs 5 MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASE SHOULD BE RELATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?