Joltid Limited v. Skype Technologies S.A. et al

Filing 35

Download PDF
Joltid Limited v. Skype Technologies S.A. et al Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & W EST LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW S AN F RANCISCO LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CSB NO. 115163) lpulgram@fenwick.com JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB NO. 178058) jwakefield@fenwick.com ALBERT L. SIEBER (CSB NO. 233482) asieber@fenwick.com LIWEN A. MAH (CSB NO. 239033) lmah@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 Attorneys for Defendants STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., EMC CORPORATION, , and DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. NETBULA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaint iff, Case No. C-06-07391-MJJ [PROPOSED] ORDER ON VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Dept: Judge: Courtroom 11 The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a New York corporation; EMC CORPORATION, a Massachusetts corporation; VERITAS SOFTWARE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC., a Florida corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS ORDER ON VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS -1- CASE NO. C-06-07391-MJJ Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & W EST LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW S AN F RANCISCO The Court convened a telephonic conference on October 31, 2007 at 2:00 P.M. Plaintiff Netbula, LLC was represented by Vonnah Brillet. Defendants Storage Technology Corp., Sun Microsystems, Inc., Darden Restaurants, Inc. and EMC Corporation ("Defendants") were represented by Laurence Pulgram and Jedediah Wakefield. The Court having considered the pleadings filed by the parties and the argument of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication of Issues Relating to License Defense [Docket Nos. 63-67] is hereby rescheduled for hearing on December 13, 2007 at 3:00 P.M. Plaintiff's Opposition shall be filed and served no later than November 13, 2007, and Defendants' Reply shall be filed and served no later than November 20, 2007. Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief for Consideration of Declaration [Docket No. 78] is moot, as the declarat ion at issue was filed more than 35 days before the rescheduled hearing date. 2. Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief to Vacate Hearing on Non- 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Party Dongxiao Yue's Request for Injunctive Relief and Impoundment [Docket Nos. 80-81] is hereby GRANTED. The Motion of DongxiaoYue to Intervene and Join as Plaintiff; for Injunctive Relief; and for Copyright Impoundment [Docket Nos. 68-72] will be taken off calendar. The Court will decide the appropriate schedule for considering this motion after the hearing on Netbula's Motion for Substitution of Party as to the Copyright Infringement Claim [Docket Nos. 56-58], which remains scheduled for hearing November 20, 2007. 4. Ms. Brillet's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Netbula [Docket Nos. 59- 61] will be taken off calendar for November 20, 2007, and will be decided after the Court's ruling granting or denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication of Issues Relating to License Defense. Ms. Brillet will continue as counsel for Netbula in the interim, pending the Court's ruling. SO ORDERED. Dated:______11/___07___________ __ 01/__ ISTRIC The status conference on 12/11/07 is ES D TC AT VACATED. T RT U O United States District Judge NO ORDER ON VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI -2- CASE NO. C-06-07391-MJJ FO Judge M artin J. Jenkins R NIA ___________________________________ UNIT ED S RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?