Ramirez-Lozano v. Napolitano et al

Filing 7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE : Respondents must file and serve an answer showing why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued, on or before 11/20/09. Petitioner's optional traverse is due 12/18/09. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 20, 2009 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge v. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., Respondents. / FEDERICO RAMIREZ-LOZANO, Petitioner, No. C 09-4433 SI ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petitioner Federico Ramirez-Lozano has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petition alleges that an Order of Release on Recognizance issued by the United States Immigration Customs and Enforcement is unlawful and places restraints upon petitioner's liberty. The Court concludes that the petition warrants a response from respondents. Respondents must file and serve upon petitioner, on or before November 20, 2009, an answer showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued. Respondents must file with the answer a copy of all portions of the administrative proceedings that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented in the petition. If petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he must do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on respondents on or before December 18, 2009. If the parties wish to modify this schedule, they may do so by joint stipulation. If, after review of the parties' answer and traverse, the Court determines that oral argument is necessary, the Court shall so notify the parties. IT IS SO ORDERED.