Henshall v. Central Parking, Inc. et al

Filing 45

ORDER DECLARING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/4/2010: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. CENTRAL PARKING, INC., et al., Defendants. / WILLIAM HENSHALL, Plaintiff, No. C 09-04481 SI ORDER DECLARING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On November 6, 2009, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why plaintiff should not be declared a vexatious litigant and be subject to a pre-filing order requiring him to obtain leave of Court before filing any additional pleadings against the same defendants based on the same subject matter. See Order to Show Cause (Docket No. 39). Plaintiff having filed no response to the Court's Order to Show Cause, and in accordance with the findings set forth in that Order, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff is enjoined from filing any action in the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California against defendants Central Parking, Inc., New South Parking, Ampco System Parking, Inc., Joy Riddle, or any of their employees, agents, attorneys, affiliates, subsidiaries, parents, successors, or predecessors that arises out of or is related to the requirement that plaintiff submit I-9, W-4, and other immigration and tax-related information as a precondition to employment, or arises out of or is related to plaintiff's theory that is not a United States citizen and is therefore not subject to federal laws relating to taxation or immigration, unless and until such an action is first approved by the Court.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.

To obtain the Court's approval to file an action against any of the individuals identified

above based on the facts or legal theories identified above, plaintiff must file a motion for leave, along with a copy of the proposed complaint. The application will be assigned to Judge Illston unless the Chief Judge of the Northern District of California assigns another judge for this purpose.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 29, 2009

SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

2