Jacks v. Chevron Corporation et al

Filing 87

ORDER GRANTING 86 Stipulation to Continue Briefing and Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 9/23/2011. Replies due by 10/14/2011. Motion Hearing set for 12/16/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/12/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2011)

Case3:09-cv-04523-JSW Document86

1
2
3
4
5
6

Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 3

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)
PRICE AND ASSOCIATES
A Professional Law Corporation
901 Clay Street
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RICHARD O. JACKS

7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

RICHARD O. JACKS,

14

Plaintiff,

15

v.

16

CHEVRON CORPORATION, PAUL
MORAN and KEVIN HOFER, DOES 1
through 15 inclusive,

17
18

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. C09-4523 JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING AND
HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DATE:

SEPTEMBER 9, 2011

19
20
21
22

The parties, by and through their respective counsels of record, hereby stipulate and
jointly request the Court’s authorization and Order to enlarge the dispositive motion schedule in this
action and set a hearing before December 23, 2011. Good cause exists for this enlargement of time

23
because Plaintiff’s counsel has been in trial and unavailable to prepare a meaningful and/or complete
24
opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties request a brief extension of
25
time to permit Plaintiff to prepare an opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and
26
27
28
1182P 210J ML

a hearing date for the dispositive motion at its convenience at the earliest practicable opportunity
excluding December 23 or 30th.
-1STIPULATION RE: DISPOSITIVE MOTION (C09-4523 JSW)

Case3:09-cv-04523-JSW Document86

1

Filed09/09/11 Page2 of 3

The parties have agreed to the following modified dispositive motion schedule:

2
3

EVENT

CURRENT DATE

PROPOSED DATE

September 9, 2011

September 23, 2011

5

Plaintiff’s Opposition to
Dispositive Motion

6

Defendants’ Reply Brief

September 16, 2011

October 14, 2011

Dispositive Motion Hearing

September 30, 2011

TBD

4

7
8
9

Dated: September 9, 2011

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

10
11

/s/ Pamela Y . Price
PAMELA Y. PRICE, Attorneys for Plaintiff
RICHARD O. JACKS

12
13
14

Dated: September 9, 2011

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN
LLP

15
/s/ Marcia L. Pope
MARCIA L. POPE, Attorneys for Defendants
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC, PAUL MORAN and
KEVIN HOFER

16
17
18
19

ORDER

20
21
22

The Court having read and considered the parties’ stipulation to continue briefing and
hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and good cause appearing therefore, the
Court adopts the following schedule:

23
24

EVENT

CURRENT DATE

PROPOSED DATE

25

Plaintiff’s Opposition to
Dispositive Motion

September 9, 2011

September 23, 2011

Defendants’ Reply Brief

September 16, 2011

October 14, 2011

26
27
28
1182P 210J ML

-2STIPULATION RE: DISPOSITIVE MOTION (C09-4523 JSW)

Case3:09-cv-04523-JSW Document86

Filed09/09/11 Page3 of 3

1

EVENT

CURRENT DATE

PROPOSED DATE

2

Dispositive Motion Hearing

September 30, 2011

December 16, 2011

3
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6
7
8

September 12, 2011
Dated: _____________
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1182P 210J ML

-3STIPULATION RE: DISPOSITIVE MOTION (C09-4523 JSW)