De Bellis v. Carbis, Inc.

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 25 EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2010. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/21/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2010)

Download PDF
De Bellis v. Carbis, Inc. Doc. 2 *E-Filed 7/21/10* 1 AARON ROBLAN, State Bar No. 244307 2 JOHN G. LEE, State Bar No. 238899 3 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 4 One Market Plaza 5 Telephone: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8915583_1.DOC aaron.roblan@ogletreedeakins.com john.lee@ogletreedeakins.com Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 San Francisco, California 94105 (415) 442-4810 Facsimile: (415) 442-4870 Attorneys for Defendant CARBIS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ANTHONY DE BELLIS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CARBIS, INC., a company of unknown formation, Defendant. Case No. C 09-04532 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 Action Filed: Trial Date: August 7, 2009 None Set Case No. C 09-04532 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Counsel report that they have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12 2 and ADR L.R. 6-5: 3 The parties agree that the deadline to complete mediation should be extended in light of the 4 fact the parties have been unable to informally resolve the matter or agree to a mediation date 5 before the current deadline of July 21, 2010. The previous deadline of July 21, 2010 to hold 6 mediation is vacated. The new deadline to hold mediation is September 30, 2010. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8915583_1.DOC PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 DATED: July ___, 2010 _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE RICHARD SEEBORG 1 Case No. C 09-04532 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?