BMMsoft Inc v. White Oaks Technology Inc

Filing 57

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME RE: FILING OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The deadline for plaintiff to file opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment is extended to April 19, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 19, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Perry J. Narancic, CA State Bar No. 206820 NARANCIC & KATZMAN, PC 325 Sharon Park Drive, #736 Menlo Park, CA 94025 www.nk-pc.com [e-mail] Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff BMMSOFT, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

BMMSOFT INC., Plaintiff, v.

CASE NO. CV -09-04562-MMC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON RE: FILING IF PLAINTIFF'S OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
NARANCIC & KATZMAN, PC ATTORNEYS AT LAW WWW.NK-PC.COM

WHITE OAKS TECHNOLOGY INC. and DOES 1-10, Defendants And UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE Defendant-Intervenor

Hearing Date: May 7, 2010

Defendant White Oaks Technology, Inc. ("WOTI") has filed a motion for summary judgment in the within action, which is set for hearing on May 7, 2010. Due to illness of Plaintiff's counsel, Plaintiff seeks leave of the Court, and WOTI stipulates, to extend time to file Plaintiff's opposition to April 19, 2010. -1Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time BMM v. White Oaks Technology Case No. CV 09-04562-MMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DATED: April 16, 2010. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
NARANCIC & KATZMAN, PC ATTORNEYS AT LAW WWW.NK-PC.COM

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: April 16, 2010

BROWN RUDNICK, LLP By: /s/ Shlomo D. Katz Shlomo D. Katz [admitted pro hac vice] Attorneys for Defendant WHITE OAK TECHNOLOGIES, INC NARANCIC & KATZMAN, PC By: /s/ Perry J. Narancic* Parry J. Narancic Attorney for Plaintiff BMMSOFT, INC

*Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Perry J. Narancic hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained by Mr. Katz. As of the filing of this document, counsel for Intervenor has not yet responded to Plaintiff's request.

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 19, 2010

By:__________________________ United States District Judge

-2Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time BMM v. White Oaks Technology Case No. CV 09-04562-MMC