BMMsoft Inc v. White Oaks Technology Inc

Filing 80

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. It is ordered that plaintiff's claims alleged herein against defendant be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 21, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2010)

Download PDF
BMMsoft Inc v. White Oaks Technology Inc Doc. 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims alleged herein against defendant be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 21, 2010 v. WHITE OAKS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. / United States District Court BMMSOFT, INC., Plaintiff, No. C 09-4562 MMC ORDER OF DISMISSAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?