Maynard et al v. Accredo Therapeutics Inc et al
Filing
64
ORDER re 63 Proposed Order, filed by Smiths Medical MD Inc, Accredo Health Group Inc, Smiths Medical ASD, Inc.,, Medco Health Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge JAMES LARSON on 5/2/11. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011)
Michelle Rognlien Gilboe (Pro Hac Vice)
Shane V. Bohnen (Pro Hac Vice)
Jenn A. Covington (SBN 233625)
AND BROOKE LLP
150 S. Fifth Street, Suite 3000
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Tel: I6121 339-8682
Fax: 612 672-3200
jenny.covington@bowmanandbrooke.com
BOVYMAN
Attorne s for Defendants
ACCR~DO
HEALTH GROUP, INC
MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, IN'c.,
SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC.
former1 known as
SMITH& MEDICAL MD, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
TAMARA MAYNARD, JOSEPH MAYNARD, )
and SEAN MAYNARD,
1
)
)
Plaintiffs,
vs .
)
)
ACCREDO THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
)
DELTEC, INC., and DOES 1 through 50,
)
inclusive,
)
CASE NO.
3:09-CV-04564-JL
(Removed from San Francisco County
Superior Court - Case No. CGC-09484970)
Assigned:
Hon. Magistrate Judge
James Larson
Department: Courtroom F, FI. 15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Action Filed: February 13, 2009
Trial Date: None
Motion Cutoff: December 2,201 1
Discovery Cutoff: May2,2011
PURSLIANT TO STIPLILATION, IT I SO ORDERED that the Case
S
Management Schedule be amended as follows:
~595093 3
V.
1
Case No. 3:09cv-04564-JL
[PROPOSED] AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Discovery cutoff:
81112011
Expert Deadlines:
101312011 for Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosures
11118120 11 for Plaintiffs' trial experts deposed
12119120 11 for Defendants' trial experts disclosed
112712012 for Defendants' trial experts to be deposed
Dispositive Motions: 212712012 with a hearing date of early April, 2012
The parties are to decide on a joint ADR process at or around August 1,2011.
DATED:
W//
~ ~ ~ R A JAMESELARSON
B L
M595093 v. 3
2
-
Case No. 3:09-cv-04564-JL
[PROPOSED] AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?