Maynard et al v. Accredo Therapeutics Inc et al

Filing 64

ORDER re 63 Proposed Order, filed by Smiths Medical MD Inc, Accredo Health Group Inc, Smiths Medical ASD, Inc.,, Medco Health Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge JAMES LARSON on 5/2/11. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011)

Download PDF
Michelle Rognlien Gilboe (Pro Hac Vice) Shane V. Bohnen (Pro Hac Vice) Jenn A. Covington (SBN 233625) AND BROOKE LLP 150 S. Fifth Street, Suite 3000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel: I6121 339-8682 Fax: 612 672-3200 jenny.covington@bowmanandbrooke.com BOVYMAN Attorne s for Defendants ACCR~DO HEALTH GROUP, INC MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, IN'c., SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. former1 known as SMITH& MEDICAL MD, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION TAMARA MAYNARD, JOSEPH MAYNARD, ) and SEAN MAYNARD, 1 ) ) Plaintiffs, vs . ) ) ACCREDO THERAPEUTICS, INC., ) DELTEC, INC., and DOES 1 through 50, ) inclusive, ) CASE NO. 3:09-CV-04564-JL (Removed from San Francisco County Superior Court - Case No. CGC-09484970) Assigned: Hon. Magistrate Judge James Larson Department: Courtroom F, FI. 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Action Filed: February 13, 2009 Trial Date: None Motion Cutoff: December 2,201 1 Discovery Cutoff: May2,2011 PURSLIANT TO STIPLILATION, IT I SO ORDERED that the Case S Management Schedule be amended as follows: ~595093 3 V. 1 Case No. 3:09cv-04564-JL [PROPOSED] AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE Discovery cutoff: 81112011 Expert Deadlines: 101312011 for Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosures 11118120 11 for Plaintiffs' trial experts deposed 12119120 11 for Defendants' trial experts disclosed 112712012 for Defendants' trial experts to be deposed Dispositive Motions: 212712012 with a hearing date of early April, 2012 The parties are to decide on a joint ADR process at or around August 1,2011. DATED: W// ~ ~ ~ R A JAMESELARSON B L M595093 v. 3 2 - Case No. 3:09-cv-04564-JL [PROPOSED] AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?