Ward v. Equilon Enterprises LLC et al

Filing 61

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 60 FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY AND MEDIATION DEADLINES AND TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/29/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 7/29/11* 1 JOSEPH E. ADDIEGO III (CA State Bar No. 169522) NICK S. VERWOLF (admitted Pro Hac Vice) 2 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 (415) 276-6599 4 Facsimile: Email: joeaddiego@dwt.com nickverwolf@dwt.com 5 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 6 Attorneys for Defendants EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC, and 7 SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC 8 STEGER P. JOHNSON (CA State Bar No. 83421) STEVEN J. BELL (CA State Bar No. 126567) 9 JONES, CLIFFORD, JOHNSON, DEHNER, WONG, MORRISON, SHEPPARD & BELL, LLP 10 100 Van Ness Avenue, 19th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 431-5310 11 Telephone: Facsimile: (415) 431-2266 sjohnson@jonesclifford.com 12 Email: 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff, KENT WARD 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 KENT WARD, 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC, SHELL OIL ) PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC AND DOES 1 ) TO 50, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. CV 09-04565 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY AND MEDIATION DEADLINES AND TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) 6-2] Trial Date: None 24 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b) and 6-2 of the United States District Court for the 25 Northern District of California, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Kent Ward and 26 Defendants Equilon Enterprises, LLC (“Equilon”) and Shell Oil Products Company LLC 27 (“Shell”), by and through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 28 1 STIPULATION FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND CMC Case No. CV 09-04565 RS DWT 17667612v1 0050411-000105 1 1) All discovery and expert discovery deadlines set forth in this Court’s April 8, 2010 2 Case Management Scheduling Order and originally extended for a period of 90 (ninety) days per 3 this Court’s October 8, 2010 Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery and Mediation Deadlines 4 and to Reschedule Further Case Management Conference, and extended another 45 (forty five) 5 days in this Court’s January 20, 2011 Stipulation and Order For Second Extension of Discovery 6 and Mediation Deadlines and to Reschedule Further Case Management Conference, and extended 7 again per this Court’s March 3, 2011 Stipulation and Order for Third Extension of Discovery and 8 Mediation Deadlines and to Reschedule Further Case Management Conference, shall be extended 9 from the current deadlines stated in the March 3, 2011 Order, as follows: a) All non-expert discovery shall be completed on or before October 11, 2011; 11 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 10 b) Plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with 12 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before November 10, 2011; 13 c) Defendants shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with 14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before December 12, 2011; 15 d) All discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 16 Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed on or before January 20, 2012. 17 2) The October 6, 2011 Further Case Management Conference has been rescheduled by 18 the Court in its Order Overruling Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Determination (Docket #59) to 19 January 26, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in the Courtroom of the Honorable Richard Seeborg, Courtroom 3, 20 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The 21 aforesaid Order directs the parties to file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week 22 prior to the Conference. 23 This Stipulation follows the parties’ filing of their Stipulation and [Proposed Order] for 24 Fifth Extension of Discovery and Mediation Deadlines and to Reschedule Further Case 25 Management Conference (Docket #58), which was not ordered by this Court, and this Court’s 26 aforesaid Order (Docket #59). The parties are prepared to continue with discovery in this matter 27 now that this Court has ruled on Defendants’ Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Order of 28 2 STIPULATION FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND CMC Case No. CV 09-04565 RS DWT 17667612v1 0050411-000105 1 Magistrate Judge Dated February 24, 2011 (Docket #49), the outcome of which dictates the proper 2 scope of examination of several of the remaining deponents. 3 This is the fifth stipulated time modification in this case, as set forth above. No trial date 4 has been set, so this extension will not require that a trial date be rescheduled. The Further Case 5 Management Conference previously set for October 6, 2011 already has been rescheduled by the 6 Court to January 26, 2011. 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 Date: July 25, 2011 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 9 By: 10 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 11 /s/ Joseph E. Addiego III JOSEPH E. ADDIEGO III Attorneys for Defendants EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC, and SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC 12 13 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED 15 Date: July 25, 2011 16 JONES, CLIFFORD, JOHNSON, DEHNER, WONG, MORRISON, SHEPPARD & BELL, LLP 17 By: /s/ Steven J. Bell Steven J. Bell 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff KENT WARD 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND CMC Case No. CV 09-04565 RS DWT 17667612v1 0050411-000105 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, the foregoing is approved and IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 29 4 DATED: July ___, 2011. __________________________________________ THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Case No. CV 09-04565 RS DWT 17667612v1 0050411-000105

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?