Ward v. Equilon Enterprises LLC et al
Filing
61
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 60 FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY AND MEDIATION DEADLINES AND TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/29/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2011)
*E-Filed 7/29/11*
1 JOSEPH E. ADDIEGO III (CA State Bar No. 169522)
NICK S. VERWOLF (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
2 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 276-6500
(415) 276-6599
4 Facsimile:
Email:
joeaddiego@dwt.com
nickverwolf@dwt.com
5
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
6 Attorneys for Defendants
EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC, and
7 SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC
8 STEGER P. JOHNSON (CA State Bar No. 83421)
STEVEN J. BELL (CA State Bar No. 126567)
9 JONES, CLIFFORD, JOHNSON, DEHNER,
WONG, MORRISON, SHEPPARD & BELL, LLP
10 100 Van Ness Avenue, 19th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 431-5310
11 Telephone:
Facsimile:
(415) 431-2266
sjohnson@jonesclifford.com
12 Email:
13 Attorneys for Plaintiff, KENT WARD
14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
KENT WARD,
18
19
20
21
22
23
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC, SHELL OIL )
PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC AND DOES 1 )
TO 50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. CV 09-04565 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED
ORDER] FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF
DISCOVERY AND MEDIATION
DEADLINES AND TO RESCHEDULE
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
[Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) 6-2]
Trial Date: None
24
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b) and 6-2 of the United States District Court for the
25
Northern District of California, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Kent Ward and
26
Defendants Equilon Enterprises, LLC (“Equilon”) and Shell Oil Products Company LLC
27
(“Shell”), by and through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
28
1
STIPULATION FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND CMC
Case No. CV 09-04565 RS
DWT 17667612v1 0050411-000105
1
1) All discovery and expert discovery deadlines set forth in this Court’s April 8, 2010
2 Case Management Scheduling Order and originally extended for a period of 90 (ninety) days per
3 this Court’s October 8, 2010 Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery and Mediation Deadlines
4 and to Reschedule Further Case Management Conference, and extended another 45 (forty five)
5 days in this Court’s January 20, 2011 Stipulation and Order For Second Extension of Discovery
6 and Mediation Deadlines and to Reschedule Further Case Management Conference, and extended
7 again per this Court’s March 3, 2011 Stipulation and Order for Third Extension of Discovery and
8 Mediation Deadlines and to Reschedule Further Case Management Conference, shall be extended
9 from the current deadlines stated in the March 3, 2011 Order, as follows:
a)
All non-expert discovery shall be completed on or before October 11, 2011;
11
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
10
b)
Plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with
12 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before November 10, 2011;
13
c)
Defendants shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with
14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before December 12, 2011;
15
d)
All discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
16 Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed on or before January 20, 2012.
17
2) The October 6, 2011 Further Case Management Conference has been rescheduled by
18 the Court in its Order Overruling Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Determination (Docket #59) to
19 January 26, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in the Courtroom of the Honorable Richard Seeborg, Courtroom 3,
20 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The
21 aforesaid Order directs the parties to file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week
22 prior to the Conference.
23
This Stipulation follows the parties’ filing of their Stipulation and [Proposed Order] for
24 Fifth Extension of Discovery and Mediation Deadlines and to Reschedule Further Case
25 Management Conference (Docket #58), which was not ordered by this Court, and this Court’s
26 aforesaid Order (Docket #59). The parties are prepared to continue with discovery in this matter
27 now that this Court has ruled on Defendants’ Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Order of
28
2
STIPULATION FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND CMC
Case No. CV 09-04565 RS
DWT 17667612v1 0050411-000105
1 Magistrate Judge Dated February 24, 2011 (Docket #49), the outcome of which dictates the proper
2 scope of examination of several of the remaining deponents.
3
This is the fifth stipulated time modification in this case, as set forth above. No trial date
4 has been set, so this extension will not require that a trial date be rescheduled. The Further Case
5 Management Conference previously set for October 6, 2011 already has been rescheduled by the
6 Court to January 26, 2011.
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8 Date: July 25, 2011
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
9
By:
10
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
11
/s/ Joseph E. Addiego III
JOSEPH E. ADDIEGO III
Attorneys for Defendants EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC,
and SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC
12
13
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED
15 Date: July 25, 2011
16
JONES, CLIFFORD, JOHNSON, DEHNER, WONG,
MORRISON, SHEPPARD & BELL, LLP
17
By:
/s/ Steven J. Bell
Steven J. Bell
18
19
Attorneys for Plaintiff KENT WARD
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION FOR FIFTH EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND CMC
Case No. CV 09-04565 RS
DWT 17667612v1 0050411-000105
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, the foregoing is approved and IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
29
4 DATED: July ___, 2011.
__________________________________________
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
Case No. CV 09-04565 RS
DWT 17667612v1 0050411-000105
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?