High Sierra Hikers Association v. United States Department of the Interior et al

Filing 135

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 134 TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francsco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/6/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MELINDA L. HAAG (CSBN 132612)
United States Attorney
ALEX TSE (CSBN 152348)
Acting Chief, Civil Division
MICHAEL T. PYLE (CSBN 172954)
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Northern District of California
150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

7

13

IGNACIA S. MORENO
Assistant Attorney General
Environment and Natural Resources Division
CHARLES R. SHOCKEY (D.C. Bar No. 914879)
Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice
Environment and Natural Resources Division
Natural Resources Section
501 “I” Street, Suite 9-700
Sacramento, CA 95814-2322
Telephone:
916-930-2203
Facsimile:
916-930-2210
Email:
[e-mail]

14

Attorneys for Defendants

8
9
10
11
12

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

HIGH SIERRA HIKERS ASSOCIATION,

20
21
22

Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE
INTERIOR, et al.,

Case No.

CV-09-4621-RS

J OINT STIPULATION TO
REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND PROPOSED ORDER
J UDGE: HONORABLE
RICHARD SEEBORG

23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION -- Case No.CV-09-4621-RS

Courtroom: 3, 17th Floor

1
2
3

WHEREAS, on October 26, 2012, the Plaintiff High Sierra Hikers Association filed a
Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Other Expenses Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412,

4

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants United States of the Interior, et al., have been

5

engaged in settlement discussions with respect to the Plaintiff’s motion and are interested in

6

continuing settlement discussions that, if successful, could avoid the need for a hearing; and

7
8
9

WHEREAS, due to other commitments, Defendants’ counsel requested additional time to
respond to the Plaintiff’s motion in the event that the settlement discussions are not successful,
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed between the Parties that:

10

1. Defendants shall file their opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion by December 11, 2012.

11

2. Plaintiff shall file their reply in support of the Motion by January 3, 2013.

12

3. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion is continued until January 17, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.

13

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

14

In addition to stipulating to the above, I, Charles R. Shockey, attest that concurrence in the

15

filing of this Stipulation has been obtained from Barbara N. Barath, Attorney for Plaintiff.

16
17

Dated: November 6, 2012

BARBARA N. BARATH
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

18

By:
/s/ Barbara Barath [as authorized]
Barbara Barath, Attorney for Plaintiff

19
20

Dated: November 6, 2012

CHARLES R. SHOCKEY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

21

By:
/s/ Charles R. Shockey
Charles R. Shockey, Attorney for Defendants

22

[PROPOSED] ORDER
23
24
25
26

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS
SO ORDERED.
BY:
11/6/12
Dated: ______________________
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28

STIPULATION -- Case No. CV-09-4621-RS

1