High Sierra Hikers Association v. United States Department of the Interior et al

Filing 135

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 134 TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francsco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/6/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MELINDA L. HAAG (CSBN 132612) United States Attorney ALEX TSE (CSBN 152348) Acting Chief, Civil Division MICHAEL T. PYLE (CSBN 172954) Assistant U.S. Attorney Northern District of California 150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 535-5087 Facsimile: (408) 535-5081 Email: michael.t.pyle@usdoj.gov 7 13 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division CHARLES R. SHOCKEY (D.C. Bar No. 914879) Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section 501 “I” Street, Suite 9-700 Sacramento, CA 95814-2322 Telephone: 916-930-2203 Facsimile: 916-930-2210 Email: charles.shockey@usdoj.gov 14 Attorneys for Defendants 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 HIGH SIERRA HIKERS ASSOCIATION, 20 21 22 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Case No. CV-09-4621-RS J OINT STIPULATION TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PROPOSED ORDER J UDGE: HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION -- Case No.CV-09-4621-RS Courtroom: 3, 17th Floor 1 2 3 WHEREAS, on October 26, 2012, the Plaintiff High Sierra Hikers Association filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Other Expenses Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants United States of the Interior, et al., have been 5 engaged in settlement discussions with respect to the Plaintiff’s motion and are interested in 6 continuing settlement discussions that, if successful, could avoid the need for a hearing; and 7 8 9 WHEREAS, due to other commitments, Defendants’ counsel requested additional time to respond to the Plaintiff’s motion in the event that the settlement discussions are not successful, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed between the Parties that: 10 1. Defendants shall file their opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion by December 11, 2012. 11 2. Plaintiff shall file their reply in support of the Motion by January 3, 2013. 12 3. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion is continued until January 17, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 In addition to stipulating to the above, I, Charles R. Shockey, attest that concurrence in the 15 filing of this Stipulation has been obtained from Barbara N. Barath, Attorney for Plaintiff. 16 17 Dated: November 6, 2012 BARBARA N. BARATH MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 18 By: /s/ Barbara Barath [as authorized] Barbara Barath, Attorney for Plaintiff 19 20 Dated: November 6, 2012 CHARLES R. SHOCKEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 21 By: /s/ Charles R. Shockey Charles R. Shockey, Attorney for Defendants 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER 23 24 25 26 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. BY: 11/6/12 Dated: ______________________ HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 STIPULATION -- Case No. CV-09-4621-RS 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?