High Sierra Hikers Association v. United States Department of the Interior et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD to 12/16/2010 at 10:00 AM. re 39 Stipulation filed by High Sierra Hikers Association. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 9/7/2010. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2010)

Download PDF
High Sierra Hikers Association v. United States Department of the Interior et al Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ALISON M. TUCHER (SBN 171363) ATucher@mofo.com WILLIAM F. TARANTINO (SBN 215343) WTarantino@mofo.com SHAYE DIVELEY (SBN 215602) SDiveley@mofo.com GEOFFREY R. PITTMAN (SBN 253876) GPittmann@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street, 32nd Floor San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 Attorneys for Plaintiff HIGH SIERRA HIKERS ASSOCIATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HIGH SIERRA HIKERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Defendants. JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE MOTION AND HEARING DATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Honorable Vaughn R. Walker Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor Case No. CV-09-4621-VRW 19 20 21 22 23 Hearing on the motion to supplement the Administrative Record continued to: 12/16/2010 at 10:00 AM. ... 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER -- Case No.CV-09-4621-VRW sf-2854251 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2010; WHEREAS, at the January 7, 2010, status conference in this matter, the Court ordered Plaintiff High Sierra Hikers Association to move to supplement the administrative later no later than July 1, 2010 and set a hearing date for any such motion of August 5, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, Plaintiff High Sierra Hikers Association and Defendants United States of Interior et al. (collectively "Parties") engaged in negotiations with respect to the content of the administrative record; WHEREAS, the Parties jointly stipulated on June 28, 2010, to continue the motion deadline to supplement the administrative record and the hearing date for any motion of Plaintiff to supplement the administrative record; WHEREAS, based on the Parties' stipulation, the Court subsequently ordered that the motion deadline be continued to July 15, 2010, and the hearing date be continued to September 30, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, the Parties jointly stipulated on July 14, 2010, to further extend the deadline for filing the motion to August 12, 2010; WHEREAS, based on the Parties' stipulation, the Court subsequently ordered that the motion deadline be continued to August 12, 2010; WHEREAS, the Parties jointly stipulated on August 10, 2010, to further extend the deadline for filing the motion to September 2, 2010; WHEREAS, based on the Parties' stipulation, the Court subsequently ordered that the motion deadline be continued to September 2, 2010, and the hearing date be continued to October 21, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, due to health issues of its counsel, Plaintiff is unable to file on September 2, WHEREAS, the next available hearing date that works for the parties' schedules is November 18, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Parties agreed, upon the Court's approval, to reschedule the deadline for Plaintiff to move to supplement the administrative record to correspondence with a proposed November 18, 2010 hearing date. STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case No. CV-09-4621-VRW sf-2854251 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the Parties that: 2. The deadline for Plaintiff to move to supplement the administrative record be continued to September 16, 2010. 3. Defendants shall file any opposition to Plaintiff's Motion by October 14, 2010. 4. Plaintiff shall file any reply in support of the Motion by October 28, 2010. 5. The hearing date for any motion of Plaintiff to supplement the administrative record be continued to November 18, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO STIPULATED. In addition to stipulating to the above, I, Shaye Diveley, attest that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation has been obtained from Charles R. Shockey, Counsel for Defendants. DECEMBER 16, 2010 at 10:00 AM. Dated: September 2, 2010 ALISON M. TUCHER WILLIAM F. TARANTINO SHAYE DIVELEY GEOFFREY R. PITTMAN MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Shaye Diveley Shaye Diveley Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: August 10, 2010 CHARLES R. SHOCKEY By: /s/ Charles R. Shockey [as authorized] Charles R. Shockey Attorneys for Defendants STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case No. CV-09-4621-VRW sf-2854251 2 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED. Dated: _9/7/2010 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Honorable Vaughn R. Walker U.S. District Court Judge UNIT ED 5 By: S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N D IS T IC T R OF A C LI aughn R Judge V FO Walker R NIA RT U O STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case No. CV-09-4621-VRW sf-2854251 NO RT H 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?