Meyers v. Prison Health Services et al
Filing
104
ORDER re meet and confer regarding settlement. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
EUREKA DIVISION
8
LEON LEE MEYERS,
10
Plaintiff,
No. C 09-4643 TEH (NJV)
ORDER RE MEET AND CONFER
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
v.
ALAMEDA COUNTY PRISON
HEALTH SERVICES, et al.,
13
14
Defendants.
___________________________________/
15
16
The Court's order of October 19, 2012, setting the settlement conference in this case required
17
the presence of the CDCR's representative at the telephonic meet and confer between counsel. (Docket
18
no. 101.) Because the CDCR is not a defendant in this case, that requirement is HEREBY VACATED.
19
Rather than a representative of the CDCR, a representative of Alameda County shall be present at the
20
telephonic meet and confer.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated: October 22, 2012
23
24
25
26
27
28
___________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
