Meyers v. Prison Health Services et al

Filing 79

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Thelton Henderson on 5/16/12. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 LEON L. MEYERS, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 ALAMEDA COUNTY PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, et al., 9 NO. C09-4643 TEH ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Defendant. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 The Court is in receipt of counsel for Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 13 record, which sets forth the difficulties which have arisen in the relationship between Cooley, 14 LLP, and Plaintiff Leon Meyers. Plaintiff has been given notice of his attorneys’ intent to 15 file this motion, and has not yet responded. 16 If the difficulties in the relationship between Mr. Meyers and his attorneys do, in fact, 17 warrant the withdrawal of counsel, it is unlikely that Mr. Meyers will be able to find new 18 counsel, and therefore Mr. Meyers will likely have to proceed pro se. 19 In light of the fact that granting this motion may very well leave Plaintiff without 20 counsel, and in order to ensure that Mr. Meyers is afforded an opportunity to respond to the 21 motion of his attorneys, the Court will extend the deadlines previously set in this case to 22 enable Mr. Meyers to send his response to the Court, if he wishes. 23 No response is required, but if Mr. Meyers does wish to respond, he should explain 24 any opposition to his lawyers’ motion to withdraw, indicate to the Court whether he believes 25 he will be prejudiced if the Court grants the motion, and further indicate if he believes the 26 relationship between himself and his attorneys can be repaired or salvaged going forward. 27 28 1 Any such response must be postmarked on or before June 5, 2012. The hearing 2 presently set for June 11, 2012, is vacated, to be re-calendared if the Court determines further 3 hearing is required. The Court further ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff to serve Mr. Meyers 4 with a copy of this order. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: 5/16/12 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?