Meyers v. Prison Health Services et al
Filing
79
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Thelton Henderson on 5/16/12. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
LEON L. MEYERS,
6
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
ALAMEDA COUNTY PRISON
HEALTH SERVICES, et al.,
9
NO. C09-4643 TEH
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE
TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO
PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF
COUNSEL
Defendant.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
The Court is in receipt of counsel for Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw as counsel of
13
record, which sets forth the difficulties which have arisen in the relationship between Cooley,
14
LLP, and Plaintiff Leon Meyers. Plaintiff has been given notice of his attorneys’ intent to
15
file this motion, and has not yet responded.
16
If the difficulties in the relationship between Mr. Meyers and his attorneys do, in fact,
17
warrant the withdrawal of counsel, it is unlikely that Mr. Meyers will be able to find new
18
counsel, and therefore Mr. Meyers will likely have to proceed pro se.
19
In light of the fact that granting this motion may very well leave Plaintiff without
20
counsel, and in order to ensure that Mr. Meyers is afforded an opportunity to respond to the
21
motion of his attorneys, the Court will extend the deadlines previously set in this case to
22
enable Mr. Meyers to send his response to the Court, if he wishes.
23
No response is required, but if Mr. Meyers does wish to respond, he should explain
24
any opposition to his lawyers’ motion to withdraw, indicate to the Court whether he believes
25
he will be prejudiced if the Court grants the motion, and further indicate if he believes the
26
relationship between himself and his attorneys can be repaired or salvaged going forward.
27
28
1
Any such response must be postmarked on or before June 5, 2012. The hearing
2 presently set for June 11, 2012, is vacated, to be re-calendared if the Court determines further
3 hearing is required. The Court further ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff to serve Mr. Meyers
4 with a copy of this order.
5
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9 Dated: 5/16/12
THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?