Harrison v. Milligan et al

Filing 48

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REFUND CHECK 39 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/21/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MARCUS L. HARRISON, 9 Plaintiff, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 No. C 09-4665 SI (pr) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR REFUND CHECK v. D.E. MILLIGAN, et al., 12 Defendants. / 13 Docket #39 14 Plaintiff’s request for a refund check is DENIED. Docket #39. As noted on the docket, 15 Plaintiff paid his filing fee in full on May 9, 2011. The Court’s records indicate that payment 16 was applied in the following installments on the following dates: 17 November 18, 2010 $ 1.66 18 April 26, 2011 $ 90.00 19 May 9, 2011 $ 60.00 $ 98.34 $100.00 20 21 The Court’s records do not show overpayment in this case. Currently, no funds received from 22 Plaintiff are being applied for payment in this case. 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 Plaintiff has filed multiple cases in this Court. The policy of the Clerk’s Office with 2 regard to checks received from the prison is as follows: When the Clerk’s Office receives a 3 check from the prison for a particular case for which the filing fee has already been paid in full, 4 the Clerk’s Office applies that check to payment of filing fees in the litigant’s other cases. No 5 refund is issued to the litigant until the filing fees for all his cases are paid in full. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 21, 2012 _________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?