Harrison v. Milligan et al
Filing
48
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REFUND CHECK 39 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/21/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
MARCUS L. HARRISON,
9
Plaintiff,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
No. C 09-4665 SI (pr)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR REFUND CHECK
v.
D.E. MILLIGAN, et al.,
12
Defendants.
/
13
Docket #39
14
Plaintiff’s request for a refund check is DENIED. Docket #39. As noted on the docket,
15
Plaintiff paid his filing fee in full on May 9, 2011. The Court’s records indicate that payment
16
was applied in the following installments on the following dates:
17
November 18, 2010
$ 1.66
18
April 26, 2011
$ 90.00
19
May 9, 2011
$ 60.00
$ 98.34
$100.00
20
21
The Court’s records do not show overpayment in this case. Currently, no funds received from
22
Plaintiff are being applied for payment in this case.
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
Plaintiff has filed multiple cases in this Court. The policy of the Clerk’s Office with
2
regard to checks received from the prison is as follows: When the Clerk’s Office receives a
3
check from the prison for a particular case for which the filing fee has already been paid in full,
4
the Clerk’s Office applies that check to payment of filing fees in the litigant’s other cases. No
5
refund is issued to the litigant until the filing fees for all his cases are paid in full.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 21, 2012
_________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?