Hutchings et al v. Snell & Company, LLC et al

Filing 42

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 5/17/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRENT HUTCHINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SNELL & COMPANY, LLC, et al., Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION No. C 09-04680 JSW United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero's Report and Recommendation ("Report") regarding Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Defendants Snell & Company, LLC ("Snell & Co.") and Roger Snell (collectively, "Defendants"), Roger Snell's motion to set aside entry of default, and Plaintiffs' request to strike portions of Roger Snell's declaration. The time for filing objections has passed, and there have been no objections filed thereto. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Roger Snell's motion to set aside default on the condition that Roger Snell pays Plaintiffs $5,775 in attorneys' fees. Roger Snell shall pay Plaintiffs $5,775 by no later than June 7, 2010. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Roger Snell and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Snell & Co. Plaintiffs may renew their motion for default judgment against Snell & Co. at the conclusion of the case on the merits /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 against co-defendant Roger Snell. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' request to strike portions of Roger Snell's declaration. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 17, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?