Brown v. Asbestos Defendants et al

Filing 46

ORDER denying request to excuse representatives for Crane Co. from personally appearing at the settlement conference set for August 28, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 8/22/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2013)

Download PDF
K&L GATES LLP FOUR EMBARCADERO CENTER SUITE 1200 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 T +1 415 882 8200 F +1 415 882 8220 klgates.com August 15, 2013 Bogdan-Alexandru Albu bogdan.albu@klgates.com T +1 415 882 8088 F +1 415 882 8220 Honorable Jacqueline S. Corley Dept. F US District Court Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94111 Re: Oliver Brown v. Asbestos Defendants, et al. Northern District of California District Court No. 3:09-cv-04681-CRB Our Client: Crane Co. Dear Judge Corley, We respectfully request that the Court excuse Crane Co.’s corporate representative from physically appearing at the August 28, 2013, settlement conference in the above-referenced matter. Counsel will be physically present with full settlement authority, and Crane Co.’s representative will be available by phone at all times during the conference. Crane Co.’s corporate representatives and corporate headquarters are located on the east coast, nearly 3,000 miles away. Travelling across the county to attend this settlement conference in person will create significant costs, both in time and money. Crane Co. is a party to thousands of cases throughout the country, exacerbating these costs. As the client’s physical presence at the settlement conference will not likely benefit Mr. Brown or effect the settlement process, we ask the court excuse the corporate representative’s physical presence to avoid undue costs. As a party to numerous asbestos lawsuits throughout the country, Crane Co. has resolved a vast majority of its cases out of court and without the in-person involvement of a corporate representative. K&L Gates, national toxic tort counsel for Crane Co., resolves Crane Co. cases on a nearly daily basis throughout the country. With the Brayton Purcell firm alone, K&L Gates has resolved over 200 Crane Co. cases without the need for corporate representatives to physically attend the settlement conferences. Crane Co., K&L Gates attorneys, and the Brayton Purcell firm are all seasoned players in asbestos litigation. Having a corporate representative fly across the country for a face to face conference is unlikely to influence the outcome in any material way. Again, Crane Co.’s counsel will be physically present at the settlement conference with full settlement authority. In addition, Crane Co.’s corporate representative will be immediately available by telephone throughout the conference. Page 2 August 15, 2013 Per the courts July 5, 2013 order, we have written to all counsel of record to meet and confer regarding our request. Over two weeks ago, in a letter dated July 26, I invited counsel to contact me directly with any questions, concerns, or objections to this Court’s excusing our client’s physical presence at the settlement conference. I have received no responses to date. For the reasons stated, Crane Co. respectfully requests that the Court excuse Crane Co.’s corporate representative from physically attending the August 28, 2013 settlement conference. Regards, Bogdan-Alexandru Albu NO t Corley A H ER n e S c ot LI RT cqueli J u d ge J a R NIA D DENIE FO UNIT ED Dated: 8/22/2013 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S cc: All Counsel N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?